Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: add Plymovent M2M board

From: Shawn Guo <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:07:13 +0800

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 07:23:13AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 12:49:45PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 08:03:12AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > > On 20-09-11 07:09, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > > Plymovent M2M is a control interface produced for the Plymovent filter
> > > > systems.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: David Jander <[email-masked]>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email-masked]>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile          |   1 +
> > > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-plym2m.dts | 394 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  2 files changed, 395 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-plym2m.dts
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> > > > index 4572db3fa5ae..3c3811fd8613 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> > > > @@ -455,6 +455,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX6Q) += \
> > > >  	imx6dl-pico-hobbit.dtb \
> > > >  	imx6dl-pico-nymph.dtb \
> > > >  	imx6dl-pico-pi.dtb \
> > > > +	imx6dl-plym2m.dtb \
> > > >  	imx6dl-prtrvt.dtb \
> > > >  	imx6dl-prtvt7.dtb \
> > > >  	imx6dl-rex-basic.dtb \
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-plym2m.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-plym2m.dts
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..4f96e05aa03f
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-plym2m.dts
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,394 @@
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT
> > > > +// SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2014 Protonic Holland
> > > > +// SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2020 Oleksij Rempel <[email-masked]>, Pengutronix
> > > 		^
> > > @shawn: I saw a few patches adding these tags. Are they used in the near
> > > future?
> > 
> > I'm not sure.  I haven't seen this in Documentation/process/license-rules.rst,
> > nor the discussion around this.
> 
> Hi Shawn,
> 
> is it a  no go? Should I send a patch with old style copyright text?

Yeah, I would rather stay with the existing style before there is a
clear direction to the new one.

Also the vendor-prefixes patch needs an ACK from Rob.

Shawn

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel