Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: add aarch64 registers to --user-regs

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:41:55 -0300

Em Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:30:12PM +0000, John Garry escreveu:
> On 27/11/2020 15:39, Alexandre Truong wrote:
> > Previously, this command returns no help message on aarch64:
> > 
> >    -> ./perf record --user-regs=?
> > 
> >    available registers:
> >    Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>]
> >        or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
> > 
> > With this change, the registers are listed.
> > 
> >    -> ./perf record --user-regs=?
> > 
> >    available registers: x0 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 x20 x21 x22 x23 x24 x25 x26 x27 x28 x29 lr sp pc
> > 
> > It's also now possible to record subsets of registers on aarch64:
> > 
> >    -> ./perf record --user-regs=x4,x5 ls
> >    -> ./perf report --dump-raw-trace
> > 
> >    12801163749305260 0xc70 [0x40]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x2): 51956/51956: 0xffffaa6571f0 period: 145785 addr: 0
> >    ... user regs: mask 0x30 ABI 64-bit
> >    .... x4    0x000000000000006c
> >    .... x5    0x0000001001000001
> >     ... thread: ls:51956
> >      ...... dso: /usr/lib64/ld-2.17.so
> > 
> > Cc: John Garry <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Leo Yan <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email-masked]>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Truong <[email-masked]>
> 
> This looks ok, just adding in more guys recorded as reviewers in
> MAINTAINERS.

Taking that "this looks ok" as an Acked-by as per
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst/
 
> John
> 
> > ---
> >   tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
> > index 2833e101a..54efa12fd 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
> > @@ -2,5 +2,38 @@
> >   #include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
> >   const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
> > +	SMPL_REG(x0, PERF_REG_ARM64_X0),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x1, PERF_REG_ARM64_X1),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x2, PERF_REG_ARM64_X2),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x3, PERF_REG_ARM64_X3),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x4, PERF_REG_ARM64_X4),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x5, PERF_REG_ARM64_X5),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x6, PERF_REG_ARM64_X6),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x7, PERF_REG_ARM64_X7),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x8, PERF_REG_ARM64_X8),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x9, PERF_REG_ARM64_X9),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x10, PERF_REG_ARM64_X10),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x11, PERF_REG_ARM64_X11),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x12, PERF_REG_ARM64_X12),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x13, PERF_REG_ARM64_X13),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x14, PERF_REG_ARM64_X14),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x15, PERF_REG_ARM64_X15),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x16, PERF_REG_ARM64_X16),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x17, PERF_REG_ARM64_X17),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x18, PERF_REG_ARM64_X18),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x19, PERF_REG_ARM64_X19),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x20, PERF_REG_ARM64_X20),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x21, PERF_REG_ARM64_X21),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x22, PERF_REG_ARM64_X22),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x23, PERF_REG_ARM64_X23),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x24, PERF_REG_ARM64_X24),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x25, PERF_REG_ARM64_X25),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x26, PERF_REG_ARM64_X26),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x27, PERF_REG_ARM64_X27),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x28, PERF_REG_ARM64_X28),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x29, PERF_REG_ARM64_X29),
> > +	SMPL_REG(lr, PERF_REG_ARM64_LR),
> > +	SMPL_REG(sp, PERF_REG_ARM64_SP),
> > +	SMPL_REG(pc, PERF_REG_ARM64_PC),
> >   	SMPL_REG_END
> >   };
> > 
> 

-- 

- Arnaldo

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel