Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: cn913x: add device trees for topology B boards

From: Andrew Lunn <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 14:58:06 +0100

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 06:57:46AM +0000, Kostya Porotchkin wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Lunn <[email-masked]>
> > Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2020 18:35
> > To: Kostya Porotchkin <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Nadav Haklai
> > <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]; Stefan Chulski
> > <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]; Ben Peled
> > <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]
> > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: cn913x: add device trees for
> > topology B boards
> > 
> > > 1) make the DTS naming match the current SDK code
> > 
> > Where do i found the SDK?
> [KP] Unfortunately the last Github published release is 2 years old.
> The new SDK is available only after registration (and accepting the NDA terms) on marvell.com site. 

Which leads to the question, why should the mainline kernel be changed
to be compatible with a closed source SDK?

What mainline should not do is break compatibility with
mainline. Which is why i think the existing DTB file needs to keep its
name, and B gets a new file name.

   Andrew

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel