Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kexec: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef

From: Baoquan He <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:50:19 +0800

On 12/07/21 at 12:05am, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Replace the conditional compilation using "#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE"
> by a check for "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE)", to simplify the code
> and increase compile coverage.

Only checked the x86 patch, but the whole patchset looks good to me,
thanks, Jisheng.

Acked-by: Baoquan He <[email-masked]>

Maybe Andrew can help pick this whole series lest each patch need be taken
care of by its own ARCH maintainer.

> 
> I only modify x86, arm, arm64 and riscv, other architectures such as
> sh, powerpc and s390 are better to be kept kexec code as-is so they
> are not touched.
> 
> Since v1:
>  - collect Reviewed-by tag
>  - fix misleading commit msg.
> 
> Jisheng Zhang (5):
>   kexec: make crashk_res, crashk_low_res and crash_notes symbols always
>     visible
>   riscv: mm: init: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef
>   x86/setup: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef
>   arm64: mm: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef
>   arm: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef
> 
>  arch/arm/kernel/setup.c |  7 +++----
>  arch/arm64/mm/init.c    |  9 +++------
>  arch/riscv/mm/init.c    |  6 ++----
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 10 +++-------
>  include/linux/kexec.h   | 12 ++++++------
>  5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel