Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] PCI: mvebu: Implement support for legacy INTx interrupts

From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 17:19:17 +0000

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 04:18:13PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> This adds support for legacy INTx interrupts received from other PCIe
> devices and which are reported by a new INTx irq chip.
> 
> With this change, kernel can distinguish between INTA, INTB, INTC and INTD
> interrupts.
> 
> Note that for this support, device tree files has to be properly adjusted
> to provide "interrupts" or "interrupts-extended" property with intx
> interrupt source, "interrupt-names" property with "intx" string and also
> 'interrupt-controller' subnode must be defined.
> 
> If device tree files do not provide these nodes then driver would work as
> before.

Nit: this information is not useful. DT rules are written in DT
bindings, not in kernel commit logs. All I am saying is that firmware
developers should not have to read this log to write firmware.

> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c | 185 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 177 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> index 1e90ab888075..dbb6ecb4cb70 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
> @@ -54,9 +54,10 @@
>  	 PCIE_CONF_ADDR_EN)
>  #define PCIE_CONF_DATA_OFF	0x18fc
>  #define PCIE_INT_CAUSE_OFF	0x1900
> +#define PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF	0x1910

Nit: I understand it is tempting but here you are redefining or better
giving a proper label to a register. Separate patch please.

> +#define  PCIE_INT_INTX(i)		BIT(24+i)
>  #define  PCIE_INT_PM_PME		BIT(28)
> -#define PCIE_MASK_OFF		0x1910

See above.

> -#define  PCIE_MASK_ENABLE_INTS          0x0f000000
> +#define  PCIE_INT_ALL_MASK		GENMASK(31, 0)
>  #define PCIE_CTRL_OFF		0x1a00
>  #define  PCIE_CTRL_X1_MODE		0x0001
>  #define  PCIE_CTRL_RC_MODE		BIT(1)
> @@ -110,6 +111,9 @@ struct mvebu_pcie_port {
>  	struct mvebu_pcie_window iowin;
>  	u32 saved_pcie_stat;
>  	struct resource regs;
> +	struct irq_domain *intx_irq_domain;
> +	raw_spinlock_t irq_lock;
> +	int intx_irq;
>  };
>  
>  static inline void mvebu_writel(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port, u32 val, u32 reg)
> @@ -235,7 +239,7 @@ static void mvebu_pcie_setup_wins(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
>  
>  static void mvebu_pcie_setup_hw(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
>  {
> -	u32 ctrl, lnkcap, cmd, dev_rev, mask;
> +	u32 ctrl, lnkcap, cmd, dev_rev, unmask;
>  
>  	/* Setup PCIe controller to Root Complex mode. */
>  	ctrl = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_CTRL_OFF);
> @@ -288,10 +292,30 @@ static void mvebu_pcie_setup_hw(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
>  	/* Point PCIe unit MBUS decode windows to DRAM space. */
>  	mvebu_pcie_setup_wins(port);
>  
> -	/* Enable interrupt lines A-D. */
> -	mask = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_MASK_OFF);
> -	mask |= PCIE_MASK_ENABLE_INTS;
> -	mvebu_writel(port, mask, PCIE_MASK_OFF);
> +	/* Mask all interrupt sources. */
> +	mvebu_writel(port, ~PCIE_INT_ALL_MASK, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
> +
> +	/* Clear all interrupt causes. */
> +	mvebu_writel(port, ~PCIE_INT_ALL_MASK, PCIE_INT_CAUSE_OFF);
> +
> +	if (port->intx_irq <= 0) {
> +		/*
> +		 * When neither "summary" interrupt, nor "intx" interrupt was
> +		 * specified in DT then unmask all legacy INTx interrupts as in
> +		 * this case driver does not provide a way for masking and
> +		 * unmasking of individual legacy INTx interrupts. In this case
> +		 * all interrupts, including legacy INTx are reported via one
> +		 * shared GIC source and therefore kernel cannot distinguish
> +		 * which individual legacy INTx was triggered. These interrupts
> +		 * are shared, so it should not cause any issue. Just
> +		 * performance penalty as every PCIe interrupt handler needs to
> +		 * be called when some interrupt is triggered.
> +		 */

This comment applies to current mainline right (ie it describes how
current mainline handles INTx) ? IMO you should split it out in a
separate patch.

I understand it is hard but a patch is a logical _change_, this
comment is a change per se, it is a clarification on current
behaviour.

> +		unmask = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
> +		unmask |= PCIE_INT_INTX(0) | PCIE_INT_INTX(1) |
> +			  PCIE_INT_INTX(2) | PCIE_INT_INTX(3);
> +		mvebu_writel(port, unmask, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static struct mvebu_pcie_port *mvebu_pcie_find_port(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie,
> @@ -924,6 +948,108 @@ static struct pci_ops mvebu_pcie_ops = {
>  	.write = mvebu_pcie_wr_conf,
>  };
>  
> +static void mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = d->domain->host_data;
> +	irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u32 unmask;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&port->irq_lock, flags);
> +	unmask = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
> +	unmask &= ~PCIE_INT_INTX(hwirq);
> +	mvebu_writel(port, unmask, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->irq_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = d->domain->host_data;
> +	irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u32 unmask;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&port->irq_lock, flags);
> +	unmask = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
> +	unmask |= PCIE_INT_INTX(hwirq);
> +	mvebu_writel(port, unmask, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->irq_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip intx_irq_chip = {
> +	.name = "mvebu-INTx",
> +	.irq_mask = mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_mask,
> +	.irq_unmask = mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_unmask,
> +};
> +
> +static int mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_map(struct irq_domain *h,
> +				   unsigned int virq, irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> +{
> +	struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = h->host_data;
> +
> +	irq_set_status_flags(virq, IRQ_LEVEL);
> +	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &intx_irq_chip, handle_level_irq);
> +	irq_set_chip_data(virq, port);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_domain_ops = {
> +	.map = mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_map,
> +	.xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onecell,
> +};
> +
> +static int mvebu_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &port->pcie->pdev->dev;
> +	struct device_node *pcie_intc_node;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_init(&port->irq_lock);
> +
> +	pcie_intc_node = of_get_next_child(port->dn, NULL);
> +	if (!pcie_intc_node) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "No PCIe Intc node found for %s\n", port->name);
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	port->intx_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, PCI_NUM_INTX,
> +						      &mvebu_pcie_intx_irq_domain_ops,
> +						      port);
> +	of_node_put(pcie_intc_node);
> +	if (!port->intx_irq_domain) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get INTx IRQ domain for %s\n", port->name);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void mvebu_pcie_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +	struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> +	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +	struct device *dev = &port->pcie->pdev->dev;
> +	u32 cause, unmask, status;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> +	cause = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_INT_CAUSE_OFF);
> +	unmask = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
> +	status = cause & unmask;
> +
> +	/* Process legacy INTx interrupts */
> +	for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_INTX; i++) {
> +		if (!(status & PCIE_INT_INTX(i)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (generic_handle_domain_irq(port->intx_irq_domain, i) == -EINVAL)
> +			dev_err_ratelimited(dev, "unexpected INT%c IRQ\n", (char)i+'A');
> +	}
> +
> +	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
>  static int mvebu_pcie_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
>  {
>  	/* Interrupt support on mvebu emulated bridges is not implemented yet */
> @@ -1121,6 +1247,21 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_parse_port(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie,
>  		port->io_attr = -1;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Old DT bindings do not contain "intx" interrupt
> +	 * so do not fail probing driver when interrupt does not exist.
> +	 */
> +	port->intx_irq = of_irq_get_byname(child, "intx");
> +	if (port->intx_irq == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> +		ret = port->intx_irq;
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +	if (port->intx_irq <= 0) {
> +		dev_warn(dev, "%s: legacy INTx interrupts cannot be masked individually, "
> +			      "%pOF does not contain intx interrupt\n",
> +			 port->name, child);

Here you end up with a new warning on existing firmware. Is it
legitimate ? I would remove the dev_warn().

Rob certainly has more insightful advice on this.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> +	}
> +
>  	reset_gpio = of_get_named_gpio_flags(child, "reset-gpios", 0, &flags);
>  	if (reset_gpio == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>  		ret = reset_gpio;
> @@ -1317,6 +1458,7 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < pcie->nports; i++) {
>  		struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = &pcie->ports[i];
> +		int irq = port->intx_irq;
>  
>  		child = port->dn;
>  		if (!child)
> @@ -1344,6 +1486,22 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> +		if (irq > 0) {
> +			ret = mvebu_pcie_init_irq_domain(port);
> +			if (ret) {
> +				dev_err(dev, "%s: cannot init irq domain\n",
> +					port->name);
> +				pci_bridge_emul_cleanup(&port->bridge);
> +				devm_iounmap(dev, port->base);
> +				port->base = NULL;
> +				mvebu_pcie_powerdown(port);
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +			irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq,
> +							 mvebu_pcie_irq_handler,
> +							 port);
> +		}
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * PCIe topology exported by mvebu hw is quite complicated. In
>  		 * reality has something like N fully independent host bridges
> @@ -1448,6 +1606,7 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < pcie->nports; i++) {
>  		struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = &pcie->ports[i];
> +		int irq = port->intx_irq;
>  
>  		if (!port->base)
>  			continue;
> @@ -1458,7 +1617,17 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		mvebu_writel(port, cmd, PCIE_CMD_OFF);
>  
>  		/* Mask all interrupt sources. */
> -		mvebu_writel(port, 0, PCIE_MASK_OFF);
> +		mvebu_writel(port, ~PCIE_INT_ALL_MASK, PCIE_INT_UNMASK_OFF);
> +
> +		/* Clear all interrupt causes. */
> +		mvebu_writel(port, ~PCIE_INT_ALL_MASK, PCIE_INT_CAUSE_OFF);
> +
> +		if (irq > 0)
> +			irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, NULL, NULL);
> +
> +		/* Remove IRQ domains. */
> +		if (port->intx_irq_domain)
> +			irq_domain_remove(port->intx_irq_domain);
>  
>  		/* Free config space for emulated root bridge. */
>  		pci_bridge_emul_cleanup(&port->bridge);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel