[PATCH 05/16] ARM: kprobes: avoid missing-declaration warnings

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel•org>
To: Russell King <linux@armlinux•org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb•de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis•org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel•org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm•com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat•com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel•org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw•cz>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro•org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel•org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium•org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger•kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/16] ARM: kprobes: avoid missing-declaration warnings
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 17:45:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230516154605.517690-6-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230516154605.517690-1-arnd@kernel.org>

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb•de>

checker_stack_use_t32strd() and kprobe_handler() can be made static since
they are not used from other files, while coverage_start_registers()
and __kprobes_test_case() are used from assembler code, and just need
a declaration to avoid a warning with the global definition.

arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-common.c:43:18: error: no previous prototype for 'checker_stack_use_t32strd'
arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c:236:16: error: no previous prototype for 'kprobe_handler'
arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c:723:10: error: no previous prototype for 'coverage_start_registers'
arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c:918:14: error: no previous prototype for '__kprobes_test_case_start'
arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c:952:14: error: no previous prototype for '__kprobes_test_case_end_16'
arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c:967:14: error: no previous prototype for '__kprobes_test_case_end_32'

Fixes: 6624cf651f1a ("ARM: kprobes: collects stack consumption for store instructions")
Fixes: 454f3e132d05 ("ARM/kprobes: Remove jprobe arm implementation")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb•de>
---
 arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-common.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c            | 2 +-
 arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c         | 2 --
 arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c       | 2 +-
 arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.h       | 4 ++++
 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-common.c b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-common.c
index 4d720990cf2a..eba7ac4725c0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/checkers-common.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ enum probes_insn checker_stack_use_imm_0xx(probes_opcode_t insn,
  * Different from other insn uses imm8, the real addressing offset of
  * STRD in T32 encoding should be imm8 * 4. See ARMARM description.
  */
-enum probes_insn checker_stack_use_t32strd(probes_opcode_t insn,
+static enum probes_insn checker_stack_use_t32strd(probes_opcode_t insn,
 		struct arch_probes_insn *asi,
 		const struct decode_header *h)
 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c
index 88999ed2cfc4..3ee0e3024ff0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs, struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
  * kprobe, and that level is reserved for user kprobe handlers, so we can't
  * risk encountering a new kprobe in an interrupt handler.
  */
-void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct kprobe *p, *cur;
 	struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c
index dbef34ed933f..7f65048380ca 100644
--- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c
@@ -145,8 +145,6 @@ __arch_remove_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, int dirty)
 	}
 }
 
-extern void kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
-
 static void
 optimized_callback(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c
index c562832b8627..171c7076b89f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.c
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static const char coverage_register_lookup[16] = {
 	[REG_TYPE_NOSPPCX]	= COVERAGE_ANY_REG | COVERAGE_SP,
 };
 
-unsigned coverage_start_registers(const struct decode_header *h)
+static unsigned coverage_start_registers(const struct decode_header *h)
 {
 	unsigned regs = 0;
 	int i;
diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.h b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.h
index 56ad3c0aaeea..c7297037c162 100644
--- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.h
+++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/test-core.h
@@ -454,3 +454,7 @@ void kprobe_thumb32_test_cases(void);
 #else
 void kprobe_arm_test_cases(void);
 #endif
+
+void __kprobes_test_case_start(void);
+void __kprobes_test_case_end_16(void);
+void __kprobes_test_case_end_32(void);
-- 
2.39.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
