Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/7] net: dsa: mt7530: fix trapping frames with multiple CPU ports on MT7530

From: Jakub Kicinski <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 13:29:34 -0700

On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 22:09:02 +0300 Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> >> It's a new capability that nobody has used, yet, so YMMV :)  
> > 
> > Interesting, I've got some questions regarding this.
> >   
> >> For example to mark a series as Changes Requested one needs to send 
> >> the following line anywhere in the email thread:
> >>
> >> pw-bot: changes-requested  
> > 
> > I suppose a reply to the cover letter or under the cover letter thread 
> > applies?

Anywhere in the thread, the bot should walk references.

> >> The use of the bot is restricted to authors of the patches (the From: 
> >> header on patch submission and command must match!)  
> > 
> > So, for example, if this patch series was new, Vladimir would reply to 
> > the patch they're the author of with 'pw-bot: changes-requested', and 
> > the patchworks would mark the whole patch series as changes requested?  

Yes.

> Also, replying with 'pw-bot: changes-requested' on an already accepted 
> patch series as the author won't change the state from accepted to 
> changes requested, correct?

Yes, authors can only changes status from active to inactive. Accepted
is an inactive state.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel