Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/9] Create common DPLL configuration API

From: Jakub Kicinski <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 19:45:28 -0700

On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 21:03:31 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml
>  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/Kconfig
>  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_nl.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dpll.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/dpll.h
>  create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/dpll.h

Feels like we're lacking tests here. Is there a common subset of
stuff we can expect reasonable devices to support?
Anything you used in development that can be turned into tests?

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel