Re: [PATCHv3] ARM: drivers/amba: release and cleanup the resource to allow for deferred probe

From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel•org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux•org.uk>
Cc: p.zabel@pengutronix•de, linus.walleij@linaro•org,
	thor.thayer@linux•intel.com, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] ARM: drivers/amba: release and cleanup the resource to allow for deferred probe
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 15:45:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2083d164-c998-6990-9e51-86d331a36a07@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191002173209.GT25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>


On 10/2/19 12:32 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 09:35:51AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> With commit "79bdcb202a35 ARM: 8906/1: drivers/amba: add reset control to
>> amba bus probe", the amba bus driver needs to be deferred probe because the
>> reset driver is probed later. However with a deferred probe, the call to
>> request_resource() in the driver returns -EBUSY. The reason is the driver
>> has not released the resource from the previous probe attempt.
>>
>> This patch fixes how we handle the condition of EPROBE_DEFER that is returned
>> from getting the reset controls. For this condition, the patch will jump
>> to defer_probe, which will iounmap, dev_pm_domain_detach, and release the
>> resource.
>>
>> Fixes: 79bdcb202a35 ("ARM: 8906/1: drivers/amba: add reset control to
>> amba bus probe")
>> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel•org>
>> ---
>> v3: jump to defer_probe where the driver will unmap and pm_detach the
>>     driver resource for the next probe attempt
>> v2: release the resource when of_reset_control_array_get_optional_shared()
>>     returns EPROBE_DEFER
>> ---
>>  drivers/amba/bus.c | 8 ++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/amba/bus.c b/drivers/amba/bus.c
>> index f39f075abff9..4a021b1dab3d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/amba/bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/amba/bus.c
>> @@ -409,9 +409,12 @@ static int amba_device_try_add(struct amba_device *dev, struct resource *parent)
>>  		 */
>>  		rstc = of_reset_control_array_get_optional_shared(dev->dev.of_node);
>>  		if (IS_ERR(rstc)) {
>> -			if (PTR_ERR(rstc) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +			ret = PTR_ERR(rstc);
>> +			if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +				goto defer_probe;
>> +			else
>>  				dev_err(&dev->dev, "Can't get amba reset!\n");
>> -			return PTR_ERR(rstc);
>> +			return ret;
> 
> So, if of_reset_control_array_get_optional_shared() returns an error,
> we end up leaking the ioremap(), the resource claim, the pclk enable
> and pm domain?  If it returns -EPROBE_DEFER, we end up leaking the
> pclk enable?
> 
> I think this is going to be quicker if I write the patch - I haven't
> build-tested this yet though.  Please check whether this works for
> you.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 8<=====
> From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux•org.uk>
> Subject: [PATCH] drivers/amba: fix reset control error handling
> 
> With commit 79bdcb202a35 ("ARM: 8906/1: drivers/amba: add reset control
> to amba bus probe") it is possible for the the amba bus driver to defer
> probing the device for its IDs because the reset driver may be probed
> later.
> 
> However when a subsequent probe occurs, the call to request_resource()
> in the driver returns -EBUSY as the driver has not released the resource
> from the initial probe attempt - or cleaned up any of the preceding
> actions.
> 
> Fix this both for the deferred probe case as well as a failure to get
> the reset.
> 
> Fixes: 79bdcb202a35 ("ARM: 8906/1: drivers/amba: add reset control to amba bus probe")
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux•org.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/amba/bus.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/amba/bus.c b/drivers/amba/bus.c
> index f39f075abff9..fe1523664816 100644
> --- a/drivers/amba/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/amba/bus.c
> @@ -409,9 +409,11 @@ static int amba_device_try_add(struct amba_device *dev, struct resource *parent)
>  		 */
>  		rstc = of_reset_control_array_get_optional_shared(dev->dev.of_node);
>  		if (IS_ERR(rstc)) {
> -			if (PTR_ERR(rstc) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> -				dev_err(&dev->dev, "Can't get amba reset!\n");
> -			return PTR_ERR(rstc);
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(rstc);
> +			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +				dev_err(&dev->dev, "can't get reset: %d\n",
> +					ret);
> +			goto err_reset;
>  		}
>  		reset_control_deassert(rstc);
>  		reset_control_put(rstc);
> @@ -472,6 +474,12 @@ static int amba_device_try_add(struct amba_device *dev, struct resource *parent)
>  	release_resource(&dev->res);
>   err_out:
>  	return ret;
> +
> + err_reset:
> +	amba_put_disable_pclk(dev);
> +	iounmap(tmp);
> +	dev_pm_domain_detach(&dev->dev, true);
> +	goto err_release;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> 

Tested-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel•org>

Thanks,
Dinh

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel