Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/7] ARM: common: vic: Parse interrupt and resume masks from device tree

From: [email-masked] (Tomasz Figa)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:10:38 +0100

On Thursday 10 of January 2013 11:03:14 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:41:43AM +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > +- interrupt-mask : Bit mask of valid interrupt sources (defaults to
> > all valid) +- wakeup-mask : Bit mask of interrupt sources that can
> > wake up the system +  (defaults to all allowed)
> 
> Should this really be configured in the VIC itself?  It seems like
> something that might change at runtime (for example, due to the user
> configuring wakes in sysfs).

This is not the runtime interrupt/wakeup mask, but a global mask of 
available interrupt/wakeup lines on particular platform, which still have 
to be configured and enabled appropriately by user.

Best regards,
Tomasz Figa