Subject: [PATCH v8 14/17] drm: bridge: analogix/dp: add max link rate and lane count limit for RK3288

From: [email-masked] (Heiko Stübner)
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:32:26 +0100

Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015, 16:56:01 schrieb Yakir Yang:
> There are some IP limit on rk3288 that only support 4 physical lanes
> of 2.7/1.6 Gbps/lane, so seprate them out by device_type flag.
> 
> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <[email-masked]>
> ---

[...]

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c index
> 6307060..563ffb1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> @@ -890,8 +890,8 @@ static void analogix_dp_commit(struct analogix_dp_device
> *dp) return;
>  	}
> 
> -	ret = analogix_dp_set_link_train(dp, dp->video_info.lane_count,
> -					 dp->video_info.link_rate);
> +	ret = analogix_dp_set_link_train(dp, dp->video_info.max_lane_count,
> +					 dp->video_info.max_link_rate);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dp->dev, "unable to do link train\n");
>  		return;
> @@ -1156,16 +1156,25 @@ static int analogix_dp_dt_parse_pdata(struct
> analogix_dp_device *dp) struct device_node *dp_node = dp->dev->of_node;
>  	struct video_info *video_info = &dp->video_info;
> 
> -	if (of_property_read_u32(dp_node, "samsung,link-rate",
> -				 &video_info->link_rate)) {
> -		dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get link-rate\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (of_property_read_u32(dp_node, "samsung,lane-count",
> -				 &video_info->lane_count)) {
> -		dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get lane-count\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	switch (dp->plat_data && dp->plat_data->dev_type) {

drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c: In function ?analogix_dp_dt_parse_pdata?:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c:1191:10: warning: switch condition has boolean value [-Wswitch-bool]
  switch (dp->plat_data && dp->plat_data->dev_type) {
          ^

As I think we always will need to distinguish between implementations,
I guess it should be safe to exit with an error, it that implementation-data
is not available, like just doing before the switch a:

if (!dp->plat_data)
	return -EINVAL;

Heiko