Subject: [PATCH v5 01/12] KVM: ARM: IntroduceKVM_SET_DEVICE_ADDRESS ioctl

From: [email-masked] (Marc Zyngier)
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:22:39 +0100

On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:11:39 +0000, Peter Maydell
<[email-masked]>
wrote:
> On 9 January 2013 14:58, Alexander Graf <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, that was the basic idea. Considering that the patch set hasn't
>> been going
>> in for another 2 months after that discussion indicates that this isn't
>> too much of
>> an issue though :).
> 
> We might get there faster if people didn't keep nitpicking the APIs at
the
> last minute :-)

Exactly. We're trying hard to get the damned thing merged, and the
permanent API churn quickly becomes a burden.

My understanding was that a consensus was reached 2 months ago. Has
something fundamentally changed? Something that makes this API invalid? If
not, can we please keep this one?

Thanks,

        M.
-- 
Who you jivin' with that Cosmik Debris?