Subject: [PATCH] MX3x: clean kpp resource structure definitions

From: [email-masked] (Jason Wang)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:56:19 +0800

Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> Hallo Michael,
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:57:39AM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
>   
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <[email-masked]>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-mx3/devices.c |   10 +++++-----
>>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx3/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx3/devices.c
>> index a4fd1a2..a3e0fe2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx3/devices.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx3/devices.c
>> @@ -374,12 +374,12 @@ struct platform_device imx_rtc_device0 = {
>>  
>>  static struct resource imx_kpp_resources[] = {
>>  	{
>> -		.start	= MX3x_KPP_BASE_ADDR,
>> -		.end	= MX3x_KPP_BASE_ADDR + 0xf,
>> -		.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM
>> +		.start	= KPP_BASE_ADDR,
>> +		.end	= KPP_BASE_ADDR + SZ_4K - 1,
>> +		.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM,
>>  	}, {
>> -		.start	= MX3x_INT_KPP,
>> -		.end	= MX3x_INT_KPP,
>> +		.start	= MXC_INT_KPP,
>> +		.end	= MXC_INT_KPP,
>>  		.flags	= IORESOURCE_IRQ,
>>  	},
>>  };
>>     
:) The final goal is to build all i.MX platforms into a single kernel, 
your change will add troubles for that.

Regards,
Jason.
> what ist the exact problem you want to fix?  I'm OK with adding that
> comma and using SZ_4K (assuming you checked it in the reference
> manuals).  But why s/MX3x_KPP_BASE_ADDR/KPP_BASE_ADDR/ ?
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
>