Subject: [PATCH 3/4] net/fec: set phy_speed to the optimal frequency 2.5 MHz

From: [email-masked] (Troy Kisky)
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:05:30 -0700

On 9/19/2011 7:57 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:39:30PM -0700, Troy Kisky wrote:
>> On 9/18/2011 4:54 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> With the unnecessary 1 bit left-shift on fep->phy_speed during the
>>> calculation, the phy_speed always runs at the half frequency of the
>>> optimal one 2.5 MHz.
>>>
>>> The patch removes that 1 bit left-shift to get the optimal phy_speed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo<[email-masked]>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/net/fec.c |    2 +-
>>>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/fec.c b/drivers/net/fec.c
>>> index 5ef0e34..04206e4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/fec.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/fec.c
>>> @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static int fec_enet_mii_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>   	/*
>>>   	 * Set MII speed to 2.5 MHz (= clk_get_rate() / 2 * phy_speed)
>>>   	 */
>>> -	fep->phy_speed = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(fep->clk), 5000000)<<   1;
>>> +	fep->phy_speed = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(fep->clk), 5000000);
>>>   	writel(fep->phy_speed, fep->hwp + FEC_MII_SPEED);
>>>
>>>   	fep->mii_bus = mdiobus_alloc();
>> Do you need to round up to an even value? Is the hardware
>> documentation wrong?
> The round up is something existed, and the patch does not touch that
> part.
That's not what I was referring to. Previously, phy_speed was always 
even because of the shift.
The MX53 manual says this field starts at bit 1, and bit 0 is unused. 
Therefore, maybe the
correct change would be

fep->phy_speed = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(fep->clk), 2500000)<<   1;

So, the question is, does this field start@bit 0 (your version is correct)
or bit 1? In other words, how did the hardware manual get it wrong? Wrong starting
bit, or divide by 2 not needed. Please document the mistake in the code.

>
>> Does this need a quirk? What boards has this been verified to fix?
>>
> I tested this on i.mx28, i.mx53 and i.mx6q.  Do you see problem on
> your platform?
>
I have not tested yet, but will sometime this week.