public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rnayak@ti•com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] regulator: helper to extract regulator node based on supply name
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:26:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E82FD6E.6030606@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110927185913.GU4289@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:29 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:19:37PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>> On Tuesday 27 September 2011 05:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 03:42:51PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>>>> +	if (!dev)
>>>> +		return NULL;
>
>>> So how do we handle CPUs?  cpufreq is one of the most active users of
>>> regulators...
>
>> Hmm, never thought of it :(
>> Maybe I should associate a supply name with all
>> regulators and then lookup from the global registered
>> list.
>
> I'm not sure how this should work in a device tree world, I'd *hope*
> we'd get a device tree node for the CPU and could then just make this a
> regular consumer thing but then the cpufreq drivers would need to be
> updated to make use of it.  The only reason we allow null devices right
> now is the fact that cpufreq doesn't have a struct device it can use.
>
>>>> +	snprintf(prop_name, 32, "%s-supply", supply);
>>>> +
>>>> +	prop = of_get_property(dev->of_node, prop_name,&sz);
>>>> +	if (!prop || sz<   4)
>>>> +		return NULL;
>
>>> sz<   4?  Magic!  :)
>
>> Its the valid phandle size.
>> I guess I need a sz != 4
>
> I think we need an of_get_phandle(), it'd be clearer what the check is,
> more type safe and would avoid needing to replicate the check.

Yes, there already seems to be one, of_parse_phandle() which I should
have used. thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-28 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-27 10:12 [PATCH 0/9] Device tree support for regulators Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-27 10:12 ` [PATCH 1/9] regulator: twl: Remove hardcoded board constraints from driver Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-27 11:37   ` Mark Brown
2011-09-27 14:47     ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-27 10:12 ` [PATCH 2/9] regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-27 12:10   ` Mark Brown
2011-09-27 14:48     ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-27 15:05       ` Mark Brown
2011-09-28  8:06         ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-30  4:27         ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-30  7:58           ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-30 10:49             ` Mark Brown
2011-09-30 10:28           ` Mark Brown
2011-09-30 10:48             ` Mark Brown
2011-09-30 11:09               ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-30 11:35                 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-30 12:18                 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-04  5:28                   ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-10-04 10:18                     ` Mark Brown
2011-10-04 11:40                       ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-10-04 11:51                         ` Mark Brown
2011-10-04 12:02                           ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-10-04 12:11                             ` Mark Brown
2011-10-04 12:40                               ` Nayak, Rajendra
2011-09-30  1:24     ` Grant Likely
2011-10-04 23:01     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-04 23:48       ` Grant Likely
2011-09-27 10:12 ` [PATCH 3/9] omap4: sdp: Pass regulator data from dt Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-27 10:12 ` [PATCH 4/9] regulator: twl: Make twl-regulator driver extract data from DT Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-27 12:14   ` Mark Brown
2011-09-27 14:48     ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-27 10:12 ` [PATCH 5/9] regulator: helper routine to extract fixed_voltage_config Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-27 12:16   ` Mark Brown
2011-09-27 14:49     ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-27 16:13       ` Mark Brown
2011-09-30  1:26   ` Grant Likely
2011-09-27 10:12 ` [PATCH 6/9] regulator: make fixed regulator driver extract data from dt Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-30  1:34   ` Grant Likely
2011-09-27 10:12 ` [PATCH 7/9] omap4: panda: Pass regulator data from DT Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-27 10:12 ` [PATCH 8/9] regulator: helper to extract regulator node based on supply name Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-27 12:21   ` Mark Brown
2011-09-27 14:49     ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-27 18:59       ` Mark Brown
2011-09-28  8:09         ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-28  8:18           ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-28 12:26           ` Mark Brown
2011-09-30  9:34             ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-30 10:35               ` Mark Brown
2011-10-04 17:00               ` Grant Likely
2011-09-28 10:56         ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2011-09-30  1:36   ` Grant Likely
2011-09-27 10:12 ` [PATCH 9/9] regulator: map consumer regulator based on device tree Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-27 12:23   ` Mark Brown
2011-09-27 14:49     ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-30  1:38   ` Grant Likely
2011-09-30  9:29     ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-30  1:39 ` [PATCH 0/9] Device tree support for regulators Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E82FD6E.6030606@ti.com \
    --to=rnayak@ti$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox