From: rnayak@ti•com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: Look for hwmod/module level context lost count if supported
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:11:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEB3C64.30008@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1112160538200.12660@utopia.booyaka.com>
On Friday 16 December 2011 06:08 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>> On Friday 16 December 2011 04:46 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rajendra,
>>>
>>> I've combined your patches down to one patch and changed the logic a
>>> little bit. It looks to me that the update and clear context registers
>>> can be done in one step, since an IP block shouldn't lose context when
>>> it's enabled. But maybe I'm missing something?
>>
>> Thanks for the patch. The changes look fine and I also did a quick
>> test on an internal tree which supports core OSWR and it seems to
>> work fine too.
>
> Great, thanks. Will wait on this one until you have a chance to tinker
> with it during the 3.4 time frame.
Sure, will work some more on this and maybe re-submit it with open
switch RET support on OMAP4 when it would really be useful and can
also be tested to work well.
thanks,
Rajendra
>
>
> - Paul
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-16 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-03 10:54 [PATCH 0/3] Support omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count() for OMAP4 Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-03 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: OMAP: hmwod: Add support for per hwmod/module context lost count Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-03 10:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: Update/Clear module specific context lost counters Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-03 10:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: Look for hwmod/module level context lost count if supported Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-29 18:10 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-12-02 4:46 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-16 11:16 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 11:23 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 12:21 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-16 12:38 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 12:17 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-16 12:38 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 12:41 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EEB3C64.30008@ti.com \
--to=rnayak@ti$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox