Subject: [RFC v2 PATCH 2/3] dt: device tree bindings for TI's EMIF sdram controller

From: [email-masked] (Aneesh V)
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:42:02 +0530

On Monday 19 December 2011 10:26 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fewer comments here. :) But see below.
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Aneesh V<[email-masked]>  wrote:
>
>
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti/emif.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
>> +* EMIF family of TI SDRAM controllers
>> +
>> +EMIF - External Memory Interface - is an SDRAM controller used in
>> +TI SoCs. EMIF supports, based on the IP revision, one or more of
>> +DDR2/DDR3/LPDDR2 protocols. This binding describes a given instance
>> +of the EMIF IP and memory parts attached to it.
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible   : One or more of "ti,emif-ddr2", "ti,emif-ddr3", and
>> +  "ti,emif-lpddr2"
>> +
>> +  "ti,emif-ddr2" should be listed of the EMIF controller on this SoC
>> +  supports DDR2 memories
>> +
>> +  "ti,emif-ddr3" should be listed of the EMIF controller on this SoC
>> +  supports DDR3 memories
>> +
>> +  "ti,emif-lpddr2" should be listed of the EMIF controller on this SoC
>> +  supports LPDDR2 memories
>> +
>> +- ti,hwmods    : For TI hwmods processing and omap device creation
>> +  the value shall be "emif<n>" where<n>  is the number of the EMIF
>> +  instance with base 1.
>> +
>> +- phy-type     : string indicating the phy type. Should be one of the
>> +  following:
>> +
>> +  "phy-type-omap4"  : PHY used in OMAP4 family of SoCs
>> +
>> +  "phy-type-dm81xx" : PHY used in DM81XX family of SoCs
>> +
>> +- ddr-handle   : phandle to a "ddr" node representing the memory part
>> +  attached to this EMIF instance.
>
> Just specify said ddr node as a child of this node instead of give it
> a handle. What other bus would the ddr node sit on, if not the memory
> controller bus?

We have two SDRAM controller instances and two separate channels.
Typically, the two channels will have same type of memory attached. I
did this avoid duplication of data. Is that fine?

thanks,
Aneesh