From: tanmay.upadhyay@einfochips•com (Tanmay Upadhyay)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: pxa168: Add SDHCI support
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:14:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EF0915B.6050600@einfochips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN1soZw8khvHHWsuC8BP+sRT8d-BaWRkpZDcJhdhf4R1_OwZxQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 20 December 2011 07:08 PM, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Haojian Zhuang
> <haojian.zhuang@gmail•com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Tanmay Upadhyay
>> <tanmay.upadhyay@einfochips•com> wrote:
>>> v2 - clock register for SDHCI are not common across all MMP SoCs.
>>> So, move PXA168 implementation to pxa168.c
>>>
>>> v3 - sdhci-pxav1 driver code is merged with sdhci-pxav2. So, change
>>> the device name accordingly
>>> - start sdhci device numbering from 1 as other PXA168 devices
>>> does that
>>>
>>> v4 - Use different names for SD clock registers for PXA168 instead
>>> of redefining them in pxa168.c. Suggested by Haojian Zhuang
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Upadhyay<tanmay.upadhyay@einfochips•com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity<prakity@marvell•com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/pxa168.h | 20 ++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/regs-apmu.h | 40 ++++++++++++++-------------
>>> arch/arm/mach-mmp/pxa168.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/pxa168.h b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/pxa168.h
>>> index 7fb568d..a181608 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/pxa168.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/pxa168.h
>>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ extern void pxa168_clear_keypad_wakeup(void);
>>> #include<plat/pxa27x_keypad.h>
>>> #include<mach/cputype.h>
>>> #include<linux/pxa168_eth.h>
>>> +#include<linux/platform_data/pxa_sdhci.h>
>>>
>>> extern struct pxa_device_desc pxa168_device_uart1;
>>> extern struct pxa_device_desc pxa168_device_uart2;
>>> @@ -34,6 +35,10 @@ extern struct pxa_device_desc pxa168_device_nand;
>>> extern struct pxa_device_desc pxa168_device_fb;
>>> extern struct pxa_device_desc pxa168_device_keypad;
>>> extern struct pxa_device_desc pxa168_device_eth;
>>> +extern struct pxa_device_desc pxa168_device_sdh1;
>>> +extern struct pxa_device_desc pxa168_device_sdh2;
>>> +extern struct pxa_device_desc pxa168_device_sdh3;
>>> +extern struct pxa_device_desc pxa168_device_sdh4;
>>>
>>> struct pxa168_usb_pdata {
>>> /* If NULL, default phy init routine for PXA168 would be called */
>>> @@ -132,4 +137,19 @@ static inline int pxa168_add_eth(struct pxa168_eth_platform_data *data)
>>> {
>>> return pxa_register_device(&pxa168_device_eth, data, sizeof(*data));
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +static inline int pxa168_add_sdh(int id, struct sdhci_pxa_platdata *data)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pxa_device_desc *d = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + switch (id) {
>>> + case 1: d =&pxa168_device_sdh1; break;
>>> + case 2: d =&pxa168_device_sdh2; break;
>>> + case 3: d =&pxa168_device_sdh3; break;
>>> + case 4: d =&pxa168_device_sdh4; break;
>>> + default:
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> + return pxa_register_device(d, data, sizeof(*data));
>>> +}
>>> #endif /* __ASM_MACH_PXA168_H */
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/regs-apmu.h b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/regs-apmu.h
>>> index 8447ac6..a84de77 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/regs-apmu.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/regs-apmu.h
>>> @@ -17,27 +17,29 @@
>>> #define APMU_REG(x) (APMU_VIRT_BASE + (x))
>>>
>>> /* Clock Reset Control */
>>> -#define APMU_IRE APMU_REG(0x048)
>>> -#define APMU_LCD APMU_REG(0x04c)
>>> -#define APMU_CCIC APMU_REG(0x050)
>>> -#define APMU_SDH0 APMU_REG(0x054)
>>> -#define APMU_SDH1 APMU_REG(0x058)
>>> -#define APMU_USB APMU_REG(0x05c)
>>> -#define APMU_NAND APMU_REG(0x060)
>>> -#define APMU_DMA APMU_REG(0x064)
>>> -#define APMU_GEU APMU_REG(0x068)
>>> -#define APMU_BUS APMU_REG(0x06c)
>>> -#define APMU_SDH2 APMU_REG(0x0e8)
>>> -#define APMU_SDH3 APMU_REG(0x0ec)
>>> -#define APMU_ETH APMU_REG(0x0fc)
>>> -
>>> -#define APMU_FNCLK_EN (1<< 4)
>>> -#define APMU_AXICLK_EN (1<< 3)
>>> -#define APMU_FNRST_DIS (1<< 1)
>>> -#define APMU_AXIRST_DIS (1<< 0)
>>> +#define APMU_IRE APMU_REG(0x048)
>>> +#define APMU_LCD APMU_REG(0x04c)
>>> +#define APMU_CCIC APMU_REG(0x050)
>>> +#define APMU_SDH0 APMU_REG(0x054)
>>> +#define APMU_SDH1 APMU_REG(0x058)
>>> +#define APMU_USB APMU_REG(0x05c)
>>> +#define APMU_NAND APMU_REG(0x060)
>>> +#define APMU_DMA APMU_REG(0x064)
>>> +#define APMU_GEU APMU_REG(0x068)
>>> +#define APMU_BUS APMU_REG(0x06c)
>>> +#define APMU_PXA168_SDH2 APMU_REG(0x0e0)
>>> +#define APMU_PXA168_SDH3 APMU_REG(0x0e4)
>>> +#define APMU_SDH2 APMU_REG(0x0e8)
>>> +#define APMU_SDH3 APMU_REG(0x0ec)
>>> +#define APMU_ETH APMU_REG(0x0fc)
> Since you only append APMU_PXA168_SDH2& APMU_PXA168_SDH3, you'd
> better not touch other registers.
> If you want to clean the code, you can submit another patch to handle it.
>
Ok.
-- Tanmay
>>> +
>>> +#define APMU_FNCLK_EN (1<< 4)
>>> +#define APMU_AXICLK_EN (1<< 3)
>>> +#define APMU_FNRST_DIS (1<< 1)
>>> +#define APMU_AXIRST_DIS (1<< 0)
>>>
>>> /* Wake Clear Register */
>>> -#define APMU_WAKE_CLR APMU_REG(0x07c)
>>> +#define APMU_WAKE_CLR APMU_REG(0x07c)
>>>
>>> #define APMU_PXA168_KP_WAKE_CLR (1<< 7)
>>> #define APMU_PXA168_CFI_WAKE_CLR (1<< 6)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/pxa168.c b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/pxa168.c
>>> index 76ca15c..023659b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/pxa168.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/pxa168.c
>>> @@ -65,6 +65,32 @@ void __init pxa168_init_irq(void)
>>> pxa168_init_gpio();
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void sdh_clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
>>> +{
>>> + void __iomem *reg_offset = clk->clk_rst;
>>> +
>>> + /* Can't see any clean way to do this: Bits 3& 0 in registers
>>> + * for host 0& 2 should be set for host 1& 3 also */
>>> + if (reg_offset == APMU_SDH0 || reg_offset == APMU_SDH1)
>>> + __raw_writel(__raw_readl(APMU_SDH0) | 0x9, APMU_SDH0);
>>> + if (reg_offset == APMU_PXA168_SDH2 || reg_offset == APMU_PXA168_SDH3)
>>> + __raw_writel(__raw_readl(APMU_PXA168_SDH2) | 0x9,
>>> + APMU_PXA168_SDH2);
>>> +
>>> + __raw_writel(__raw_readl(clk->clk_rst) | clk->enable_val, clk->clk_rst);
>>> +}
>>> +
>> How about use the below code instead? I think we can avoid to check
>> register offset.
>>
>> static void sdh0_clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
>> {
>> void __iomem *reg_offset = clk->clk_rst;
>>
>> __raw_writel(__raw_readl(APMU_SDH0) | 0x9, APMU_SDH0);
>> __raw_writel(__raw_readl(clk->clk_rst) | clk->enable_val, clk->clk_rst);
>> }
>>
>> static void sdh2_clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
>> {
>> void __iomem *reg_offset = clk->clk_rst;
>> __raw_writel(__raw_readl(APMU_PXA168_SDH2) | 0x9,
>> APMU_PXA168_SDH2);
>> __raw_writel(__raw_readl(clk->clk_rst) | clk->enable_val, clk->clk_rst);
>>
>> }
>>
>> struct clkops sdh0_clk_ops = {
>> .enable = sdh0_clk_enable,
>> .disable = sdh_clk_disable,
>> };
>>
>> struct clkops sdh2_clk_ops = {
>> .enable = sdh2_clk_enable,
>> .disable = sdh_clk_disable,
>> };
>>
>> static APMU_CLK_OPS(sdh1, SDH0, 0x12, 48000000,&sdh0_clk_ops);
>> static APMU_CLK_OPS(sdh2, SDH1, 0x12, 48000000,&sdh0_clk_ops);
>> static APMU_CLK_OPS(sdh3, PXA168_SDH2, 0x12, 48000000,&sdh2_clk_ops);
>> static APMU_CLK_OPS(sdh4, PXA168_SDH3, 0x12, 48000000,&sdh2_clk_ops);
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-20 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-25 12:37 [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-pxa: Add SDHCI driver for PXA16x Tanmay Upadhyay
2011-11-10 20:09 ` Chris Ball
2011-11-21 4:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] mmc: sdhci-pxa: Trivial fix in Kconfig Tanmay Upadhyay
2011-11-21 4:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: pxa168: Add SDHCI support Tanmay Upadhyay
2011-12-01 18:05 ` Chris Ball
2011-12-15 23:15 ` Chris Ball
2011-12-19 4:45 ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-12-19 4:55 ` Tanmay Upadhyay
2011-12-19 5:02 ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-12-19 5:17 ` Tanmay Upadhyay
2011-12-19 5:24 ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-12-20 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 " Tanmay Upadhyay
2011-12-20 13:25 ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-12-20 13:38 ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-12-20 13:44 ` Tanmay Upadhyay [this message]
2011-12-20 13:44 ` Tanmay Upadhyay
2011-12-20 21:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-21 1:48 ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-12-29 13:43 ` [PATCH " Tanmay Upadhyay
2011-12-30 0:36 ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-01-23 22:45 ` Tanmay Upadhyay
2011-12-19 5:24 ` [PATCH v3 " Philip Rakity
2011-12-19 5:30 ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-11-21 4:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mmc: sdhci-pxa: Add SDHCI driver for PXA16x Tanmay Upadhyay
[not found] ` <CAMj5Bki3Ev8K63538-dNbyijUw1oNTLChADLd4=Ef-LeCkoacw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-11-25 18:53 ` Philip Rakity
2011-11-21 4:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: pxa168/gplugd: Add support for SD port 1 Tanmay Upadhyay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EF0915B.6050600@einfochips.com \
--to=tanmay.upadhyay@einfochips$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox