From: gerg@snapgear•com (Greg Ungerer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: Atmel at91x40 ("EB01" eval board) resurected
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:01:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F66BDB5.5020600@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120317164345.4f20beef@skate>
Hi Thomas,
On 18/03/12 01:43, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Le Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:18:53 -0500,
> Phil Budne<phil@ultimate•com> a ??crit :
>
>> I decided to see if I could bring up current kernel sources under
>> skyeye (at91x40 simulation).
>
> Very interesting, thanks. Your patches indeed allow the AT91x40 kernel
> to boot under SkyEye, while the unpatched Linux kernel does not,
> apparently.
>
> Greg, it seems you are saying that the mainline kernel, unchanged,
> boots under SkyEye.
No, I didn't mean to imply that in my response (
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-December/078670.html).
It has worked in the past, but I haven't run it for a few kernel
versions now.
I was hoping that Phil would respond to the couple of questions I
had about differences, but he never did.
> Could you share your kernel configuration and
> SkyEye configuration?
Yeah, its in mainline. Its one of the defconfigs:
arch/arm/configs/at91x40_defconfig
>> Runs on locally modified skyeye
>> based on skyeye-v1.2_Rel.tar (had trouble building latest release)
>> adds interrupt driven UART output
>> tweaked for programmed I/O UART input
>> fix for loading XIP data section (load at physical, not virtual address)
>
> Would you mind publishing your changes to SkyEye? So far, I'm blocked
> because of the lack of interrupt driver UART output.
>
> Do you plan on further pushing those AT91x40 changes?
It would be really nice to get Phil's changes in a form that can be
applied to mainline.
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg at snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-19 5:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-23 3:18 Atmel at91x40 ("EB01" eval board) resurected Phil Budne
2011-12-30 1:14 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-01-07 12:07 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-03-17 15:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-03-19 5:01 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F66BDB5.5020600@snapgear.com \
--to=gerg@snapgear$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox