public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: swarren@wwwdotorg•org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/10] pwm: tegra: Add device tree support
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:33:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F68A32D.1000402@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120320084807.GC20249@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de>

On 03/20/2012 02:48 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 03/14/2012 09:56 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> Add auxdata to instantiate the PWFM controller from a device tree,
>>> include the corresponding nodes in the dtsi files for Tegra 20 and
>>> Tegra 30 and add binding documentation.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design•de>
>>
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/tegra-pwm.txt
>>
>> Can this please be named nvidia,tegra20-pwm.txt so that if we need
>> different bindings for any future Tegra PWM, we won't have any filename
>> conflicts?
> 
> That file already documents the bindings for Tegra 20 and Tegra 30, that's
> why I chose the move generic name. Could this perhaps be documented within
> the file instead? Or should I rather add a nvidia,tegra30-pwm.txt with a
> reference to the nvidia,tegra20-pwm.txt?

I think it's fine for a file of name nvidia,tegra20-pwm.txt to document
both Tegra20 and Tegra30; the file is named after the first/earliest
compatible value it documents. The issue is more that /if/ say TegraNN
needs a different binding, I want the naming consistent (e.g.
nvidia,tegraNN-pwm.txt) rather than having the old file with one style
and the new file named using a different style.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-20 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-14 15:56 [PATCH v4 00/10] Add PWM framework and device tree support Thierry Reding
2012-03-14 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] PWM: add pwm framework support Thierry Reding
2012-03-14 20:52   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-03-14 20:57     ` Thierry Reding
2012-03-16  7:19   ` Shawn Guo
2012-03-16  7:28     ` Thierry Reding
2012-03-20  1:55   ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-20  5:59     ` Thierry Reding
2012-03-14 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] pwm: Allow chips to support multiple PWMs Thierry Reding
2012-03-14 20:42   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-03-14 20:49     ` Thierry Reding
2012-03-15  0:42       ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-03-14 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] pwm: Add device tree support Thierry Reding
2012-03-14 20:11   ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-14 20:46     ` Thierry Reding
2012-03-15  8:40   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-15 10:29     ` Mark Brown
2012-03-15 12:44       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-20  2:12   ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-20  5:51     ` Thierry Reding
2012-03-14 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] ARM: tegra: Fix PWM clock programming Thierry Reding
2012-03-20  2:15   ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-14 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] ARM: tegra: Provide clock for only one PWM controller Thierry Reding
2012-03-20  2:18   ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-20  8:44     ` Thierry Reding
2012-03-20 15:27       ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-14 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] pwm: Add NVIDIA Tegra SoC support Thierry Reding
2012-03-16  8:00   ` Shawn Guo
2012-03-16  8:21     ` Thierry Reding
2012-03-20  2:35   ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-14 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] pwm: tegra: Add device tree support Thierry Reding
2012-03-20  2:42   ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-20  8:48     ` Thierry Reding
2012-03-20 15:33       ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2012-03-20 15:44         ` Thierry Reding
2012-04-04  7:04     ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-04 18:33       ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-14 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] pwm: Add Blackfin support Thierry Reding
2012-03-14 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] pwm: Add PXA support Thierry Reding
2012-03-15  0:13   ` Ryan Mallon
2012-03-15  6:56     ` Thierry Reding
2012-03-15  9:05       ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-15  9:21         ` Thierry Reding
2012-03-15  9:45           ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-16  8:12   ` Shawn Guo
2012-03-16  8:29     ` Thierry Reding
2012-03-14 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] pwm-backlight: Add rudimentary device tree support Thierry Reding
2012-03-15  8:48   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-20  2:59   ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-20  8:39     ` Thierry Reding
2012-03-20 15:27       ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-20 15:43         ` Thierry Reding
2012-03-20 15:56           ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-20 16:08             ` Mark Brown
2012-03-14 23:19 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] Add PWM framework and " H Hartley Sweeten
2012-03-15  6:41   ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F68A32D.1000402@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox