public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pwaechtler@mac•com (Peter Waechtler)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: ARM11MPcore: tlb_ops_need_broadcast causes deadlock
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:22:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F6F7E99.1020500@mac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120325191556.GA3147@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 25.03.2012 21:15, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 08:22:05PM +0200, Peter Waechtler wrote:
>> On 25.03.2012 15:09, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:08:47PM +0000, Peter Waechtler wrote:
>>>> But Will, is that tlb_flush necessary at all? The ARM has only 3 permission
>>>> bits in the page table (APX and AP0 and AP1). The young/accessed bit is done
>>>> via software.
>>> Yes it most definitely is, because setting a page to be young means we
>>> must receive a subsequent fault to make it 'old' again.  This means we
>>> must set the page to be inaccessible to get that fault, and flush the
>>> TLBs across all CPUs so that any CPU accessing that page receives a
>>> fault.
>> Ok I see, it's also not the "right or perfect" fix.
> It's not a fix or anything, it's required behaviour - otherwise we could
> end up throwing out pages from the system which are actually 'hot' because
> they've stayed in the TLB and we haven't received a fault to make them
> young again.

I'm arguing solely on kswapd making a young page old. So it can't be a 
hot page.
But yes in theory it's possible that it just become hot on another cpu...

And again I don't understand the abort handler: why do we get a page 
fault on
a young page then? grrh

> Moreover, what about the case where we actually remove the page?
I don't claim that this is the only way to deadlock - but this is the 
case we encounter.

> Aren't we also holding the pte lock there?  So I don't think there's an
> obvious solution to your deadlock.
>
> I think the real question is - in your example - why are you touching
> a userspace page with IRQs off _and_ expecting the fault to be fixed up?
> You never really explained what CPU B was doing.
It was running some user space program. It was not in the kernel.
I will post the jtag probe screenshots tomorrow.

     Peter

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-25 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-22 12:24 ARM11MPcore: tlb_ops_need_broadcast causes deadlock EXTERNAL Waechtler Peter (Fa. TCP, CM-AI/PJ-CF31)
2012-03-23 17:30 ` Will Deacon
2012-03-25 12:08   ` Peter Waechtler
2012-03-25 13:09     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-25 18:22       ` Peter Waechtler
2012-03-25 19:15         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-25 20:22           ` Peter Waechtler [this message]
2012-03-25 21:55             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-26 15:20               ` Will Deacon
     [not found]   ` <274124B9C6907D4B8CE985903EAA19E91B2D5798D9@SI-MBX06.de.bosch.com>
2012-03-27 13:32     ` Will Deacon
2012-03-27 17:41       ` George G. Davis
2012-03-28  8:56         ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F6F7E99.1020500@mac.com \
    --to=pwaechtler@mac$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox