From: santosh.shilimkar@ti•com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] gpio/omap: fix missing check in *_runtime_suspend()
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 16:46:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA268F2.5090301@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335536018-16004-9-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com>
On Friday 27 April 2012 07:43 PM, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
> We do checking for bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios in order
> to skip redundant operations. Somehow, the check got missed
> while doing the cleanup series.
>
> Just to make sure that we do context restore correctly in
> *_runtime_resume(), the bank->workaround_enabled check is
> moved after context restore. Otherwise, it would prevent
> context restore when bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios is 0.
>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti•com>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide•com>
> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti•com>
> Cc: Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@ti•com>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab•ca>
> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti•com>
> ---
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti•com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-03 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-27 14:13 [PATCH 0/8] gpio/omap: remaining cleanups and fix Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-04-27 14:13 ` [PATCH 1/8] gpio/omap: remove virtual_irq_start variable Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-05-03 11:13 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-04-27 14:13 ` [PATCH 2/8] gpio/omap: remove saved_fallingdetect, saved_risingdetect Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-04-27 14:13 ` [PATCH 3/8] gpio/omap: remove suspend_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-04-27 14:13 ` [PATCH 4/8] gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup " Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-04-27 14:13 ` [PATCH 5/8] gpio/omap: remove retrigger variable in gpio_irq_handler Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-04-27 14:13 ` [PATCH 6/8] gpio/omap: remove suspend/resume callbacks Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-04-27 14:13 ` [PATCH 7/8] gpio/omap: remove cpu_is_omapxxxx() checks from *_runtime_resume() Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-05-03 11:15 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-04-27 14:13 ` [PATCH 8/8] gpio/omap: fix missing check in *_runtime_suspend() Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-05-03 11:16 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2012-05-17 22:21 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-17 23:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-17 23:56 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-18 0:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-18 4:48 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-05-18 6:22 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-05-17 23:27 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-18 14:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-18 5:12 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-05-18 8:46 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-04-27 19:07 ` [PATCH 0/8] gpio/omap: remaining cleanups and fix Grant Likely
2012-04-27 21:57 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-27 22:05 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-03 11:17 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-05-10 6:38 ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-05-10 22:13 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FA268F2.5090301@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox