Subject: [PATCH] arm: Add basic support for new Marvell Armada SoC family

From: [email-masked] (Ben Dooks)
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:25:49 +0100

On 15/05/12 17:22, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:44:38PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> Le Tue, 15 May 2012 09:35:55 -0500,
>> Rob Herring<[email-masked]>  a ??crit :
>>
>>> Directory location doesn't really have anything to do with what can be
>>> in a single kernel binary. We will soon be building single images
>>> across mach directories.
>>
>> Agreed, but it's not the case right now, and we wanted to submit today
>> a kernel that boots on both of those SoCs.
>>
>> The 370 and XP both use the PJ4B core
>
> Could mach-pj4b be an option?

Not really, that's the CPU core and will probably get re-used for a
number of products.

I'm personally happy with any of mach-marvell, mach-mv, mach-mv-axp
or similar.

-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius