public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: robherring2@gmail•com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: ARM Versatile defconfig PCI io out of range?
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 08:07:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC76D0A.9060009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205310932.51140.arnd@arndb.de>

On 05/31/2012 04:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 May 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 05/30/2012 01:02 PM, Richard Maw wrote:
> 
>>>
>>> We've tried to track down the problem, but we couldn't get much further
>>> than finding out that the IO_SPACE_LIMIT in kernel/resource.c is 0xffff,
>>> which is lower than the required 0x44000000.
>>>
>>> We're not sure whether this is a problem with it not being allocated
>>> enough space, or that it is not being translated properly.
>>>
>>> Is this a known issue, I did a quick google for the "sym53c8xx
>>>  can't reserve io" error, but nothing turned up.
>>> If not, does anyone have any pointers to how this could be fixed?
>>>
>>
>> I believe this is the same issue:
>>
>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1543569
>>
>> In looking at various PCI platforms and for a qemu platform with PCI to
>> test PCI changes, I had concluded (wrongly I guess) that Versatile PCI
>> was broken. This patch which has never gone upstream also played a part
>> in my conclusion:
>>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/021035.html
>>
>> The simple fix is to restore io.h for Versatile, but I'm looking for a
>> better way.
> 
> It looks like it's a simple bug in pci.c, which puts the wrong thing into the
> pcibios_min_io variable.
> 
> Does the below patch fix it?

I've resurrected your patch from ~2 years ago and that does fix it. Any
reason it was never merged? I could go with a more simple fix which just
restore IO_SPACE_LIMIT to ~0, but yours is more in the direction we want
to go with PCI mappings.

Rob

> 
> 	Arnd
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
> index 4ae4fc8..aeb7b60 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ int __init pci_versatile_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>  
>  void __init pci_versatile_preinit(void)
>  {
> -	pcibios_min_io = 0x44000000;
> +	pcibios_min_io = 0x100;
>  	pcibios_min_mem = 0x50000000;
>  
>  	__raw_writel(VERSATILE_PCI_MEM_BASE0 >> 28, PCI_IMAP0);
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-31 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-30 18:02 ARM Versatile defconfig PCI io out of range? Richard Maw
2012-05-30 19:19 ` Rob Herring
2012-05-31  9:32   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-31 10:48     ` Richard Maw
2012-05-31 13:07     ` Rob Herring [this message]
2012-05-31 20:40       ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FC76D0A.9060009@gmail.com \
    --to=robherring2@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox