Subject: [PATCH V2 5/5] Input: ads7846: set proper debounce time in driver level

From: [email-masked] (Zumeng Chen)
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:46:55 +0800

? 2012?06?13? 20:18, Hiremath, Vaibhav ??:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:14:10, Zumeng Chen wrote:
>> From: Zumeng Chen<[email-masked]>
>>
>> If we don't set proper debouce time for ads7846, then there are
>> flooded interrupt counters of ads7846 responding to one time
>> touch on screen, so the driver couldn't work well.
>>
>> And since most OMAP3 series boards pass NULL pointer of board_pdata
>> to omap_ads7846_init, so it's more proper to set it in driver level
>> after having gpio_request done.
>>
>> This patch has been validated on 3530evm.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zumeng Chen<[email-masked]>
>> Signed-off-by: Syed Mohammed Khasim<[email-masked]>
>> ---
>>   drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c |    4 ++++
>>   1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c
>> index f02028e..459ff29 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c
>> @@ -980,6 +980,10 @@ static int __devinit ads7846_setup_pendown(struct spi_device *spi, struct ads784
>>   		}
>>
>>   		ts->gpio_pendown = pdata->gpio_pendown;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3
>> +		/* 310 means about 10 microsecond for omap3 */
>> +		gpio_set_debounce(pdata->gpio_pendown, 310);
>> +#endif
>>
> Zumeng,
>
> With my sign-off you are changing the original code, that too
> without my sign-off and ack.
> I wouldn't mind you to submit patches from my tree, but the expectation is
> if you are changing the original code, it should be under your sign-off.
Thanks, good to learn. I'll remove in next time.
> Coming to the patch, #ifdef in driver is not recommended, and this 10msec
> delay is specific to OMAP GPIO and driver should not be aware of this,
> that's where you will find the original patch handling it in board file.
According to the git blame of the board-omap3evm.c I think
96974a24 did a good thing to all the related codes for omap3
boards. So I think we can call board and driver as BSP level :-)

If #ifdef in driver can save many codes, I guess it's deserved.

Regards,
Zumeng
> Thanks,
> Vaibhav
>>   	} else {
>>   		dev_err(&spi->dev, "no get_pendown_state nor gpio_pendown?\n");
>> -- 
>> 1.7.5.4
>>
>>