public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jdzheng@broadcom•com (Jiandong Zheng)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] ARM: pmu: remove arm_pmu_type enumeration
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:57:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50297838.7080208@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344620195-22372-5-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>

On 8/10/2012 10:36 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm•com>
>
> The arm_pmu_type enumeration was initially introduced to identify
> different PMU types in the system, the usual one being that on the CPU
> (ARM_PMU_DEVICE_CPU). With the removal of the PMU reservation code and
> the introduction of devicetree bindings for the CPU PMU, the enumeration
> is no longer required.
>
> This patch removes the enumeration and updates the various CPU PMU
> platform devices so that they no longer pass an .id field referring
> to identify the PMU type.
>
> Cc: JD Zheng <jdzheng@broadcom•com>
> Cc: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti•com>
> Cc: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail•com>
> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom•net>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson•com>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung•com>
> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm•com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm•com>
> [will: cosmetic edits and actual removal of the enum type]
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm•com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h               |   10 ----------
>   arch/arm/mach-bcmring/arch.c             |    3 +--
>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c            |    3 +--
>   arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.c              |    3 +--
>   arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_eb.c     |    3 +--
>   arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c |    3 +--
>   arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb11mp.c |    3 +--
>   arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pba8.c   |    3 +--
>   arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pbx.c    |    3 +--
>   arch/arm/mach-tegra/devices.c            |    3 +--
>   arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c         |    3 +--
>   arch/arm/mach-vexpress/ct-ca9x4.c        |    3 +--
>   arch/arm/plat-iop/pmu.c                  |    3 +--
>   arch/arm/plat-samsung/devs.c             |    3 +--
>   14 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
> index 05e0401..fbec73a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
> @@ -16,15 +16,6 @@
>   #include <linux/perf_event.h>
>   
>   /*
> - * Types of PMUs that can be accessed directly and require mutual
> - * exclusion between profiling tools.
> - */
> -enum arm_pmu_type {
> -	ARM_PMU_DEVICE_CPU	= 0,
> -	ARM_NUM_PMU_DEVICES,
> -};
> -
> -/*
>    * struct arm_pmu_platdata - ARM PMU platform data
>    *
>    * @handle_irq: an optional handler which will be called from the
> @@ -73,7 +64,6 @@ struct pmu_hw_events {
>   
>   struct arm_pmu {
>   	struct pmu	pmu;
> -	enum arm_pmu_type type;
>   	cpumask_t	active_irqs;
>   	char		*name;
>   	irqreturn_t	(*handle_irq)(int irq_num, void *dev);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcmring/arch.c b/arch/arm/mach-bcmring/arch.c
> index 45c97b1..76e7953 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcmring/arch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcmring/arch.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
>   #include <asm/setup.h>
>   #include <asm/mach-types.h>
>   #include <asm/mach/time.h>
> -#include <asm/pmu.h>
>   
>   #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
>   #include <mach/dma.h>
> @@ -116,7 +115,7 @@ static struct resource pmu_resource = {
>   
>   static struct platform_device pmu_device = {
>   	.name		= "arm-pmu",
> -	.id		= ARM_PMU_DEVICE_CPU,
> +	.id		= -1,
>   	.resource	= &pmu_resource,
>   	.num_resources	= 1,
>   };
>
Isn't it clearer to define a meaningful name for "-1", esp. if "-1" is 
being checked somewhere else?

Regards,
JD

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-13 21:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-10 17:36 [PATCH 0/9] ARM perf updates for 3.7 Will Deacon
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: PMU: Add runtime PM Support Will Deacon
2012-08-11 15:09   ` Ming Lei
2012-08-13 10:40     ` Will Deacon
2012-08-16 13:56       ` Jon Hunter
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: perf: add devicetree bindings for 11MPcore, A5, A7 and A15 PMUs Will Deacon
2012-08-10 18:42   ` Rob Herring
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: pmu: remove unused reservation mechanism Will Deacon
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 4/9] ARM: pmu: remove arm_pmu_type enumeration Will Deacon
2012-08-13 14:17   ` Linus Walleij
2012-08-13 21:57   ` Jiandong Zheng [this message]
2012-08-14  8:43     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2012-08-14 16:53       ` Jiandong Zheng
2012-08-16 13:59   ` Jon Hunter
2012-08-17 14:08   ` Jon Hunter
2012-08-20  9:01     ` Will Deacon
2012-08-20 13:05       ` Jon Hunter
2012-08-23  5:45   ` Kukjin Kim
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM: perf: remove mysterious compiler barrier Will Deacon
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM: perf: probe devicetree in preference to current CPU Will Deacon
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM: perf: prepare for moving CPU PMU code into separate file Will Deacon
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: perf: move CPU-specific PMU handling " Will Deacon
2012-08-10 17:36 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: perf: move irq registration into pmu implementation Will Deacon
2012-08-13  9:11 ` [PATCH 0/9] ARM perf updates for 3.7 Hui Wang
2012-08-13  9:32   ` Will Deacon
2012-08-14  1:46     ` Hui Wang
2013-02-28  6:54       ` i.MX6Quad PMU irq handling (was: Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM perf updates for 3.7) Dirk Behme
2013-02-28  7:27         ` Shawn Guo
2013-02-28  7:38         ` i.MX6Quad PMU irq handling Hui Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50297838.7080208@broadcom.com \
    --to=jdzheng@broadcom$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox