public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: swarren@wwwdotorg•org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM: add cpufreq transiton notifier to adjust loops_per_jiffy for smp
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:16:56 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <504F55E8.3000803@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <504F2789.1070006@nvidia.com>

On 09/11/2012 05:59 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> On Monday 10 September 2012 10:47 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 09/09/2012 07:17 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:55:00AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> Yes, that does solve the problem (well, with
>>>> s/late_init/late_initcall/).
>>>>
>>>> As you imply, that change wouldn't help if cpu-tegra.c was built as a
>>>> module.
>>> I doubt that.  Have you confirmed it with testing?  When you install
>>> module cpu-tegra, the pcie initialization has been done, right?
>> Never mind, the code can't be built as a module anyway.
>>
>> Aside from that, I misinterpreted your test patch, and thought that it
>> was moving the Tegra cpufreq driver initialization earlier, but it's
>> actually moving it later, and in fact by chance after PCIe
>> initialization, which explains why it solves the issue.
>>
>> I think the root of the problem is that cpufreq is lowering the CPU
>> frequency, yet the patch which converted Tegra to the common clock
>> framework removed the code that actually changes the CPU clock rate. So,
>> cpufreq thinks the CPU is running at e.g. 216MHz, but it's actually
>> still running at 1.0GHz, and hence re-calculating the delay loops breaks
>> things, since delays aren't as long as the system thinks they are. The
>> variability is due to whether lowering the CPU frequency just happens to
>> occur before or after the PCIe controller is initialized.
>>
>> Prashant, are you able to fix the clock driver deficiency within the
>> next 2-3 days or so (so I can include the fix in the pull requests I
>> send for 3.7, which need to be sent before the end of the week)? Or, do
>> we need to disable cpufreq for Tegra because of this?
> 
> Your fix looks good to me except the concern I have mentioned in reply
> to that patch.

Well, the cpufreq driver will need explicit knowledge of
Tega20-vs-Tegra30 anyway, due to e.g. differing CPU clock names,
probable different latencies, etc.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-11 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-10  5:37 [PATCH v3 0/3] Add a generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver Shawn Guo
2012-08-10  5:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM: add cpufreq transiton notifier to adjust loops_per_jiffy for smp Shawn Guo
2012-09-04 23:27   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-06 22:35   ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-07  2:58     ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-07 16:55       ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-10  1:17         ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-10 17:17           ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-11 11:59             ` Prashant Gaikwad
2012-09-11 15:16               ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2012-08-10  5:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] PM / OPP: Initialize OPP table from device tree Shawn Guo
2012-08-16 21:05   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-17  0:52     ` Shawn Guo
2012-08-17  1:53       ` Rob Herring
2012-09-04 23:27         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-10  5:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] cpufreq: Add a generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver Shawn Guo
2012-09-04 23:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-05  1:12     ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-05  4:53       ` AnilKumar, Chimata
2012-09-05  5:02       ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-05 13:38       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-05 13:59         ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-05 20:18           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-06  7:29             ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-06 19:59               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-31  6:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " Shawn Guo
2012-09-01  5:53   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=504F55E8.3000803@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox