public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jon-hunter@ti•com (Jon Hunter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V6 2/2] dmaengine: add helper function to request a slave DMA channel
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:25:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5060DDEB.4000600@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347938035.1943.162.camel@vkoul-udesk3>

Hi Vinod,

On 09/17/2012 10:13 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 23:36 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe that Jon is on vacation this week, so if this is the only issue
>>> holding up the merge, maybe you can change this in his patch directly, or
>>> I can send an updated version if you prefer.
>>
>> I worry that too much is going on here too quickly.  We have some people
>> working on changing the way DMA engine selects channels.  Meanwhile we
>> have other people trying to create an OF DMA engine API.
>>
>> It seems that Vinod's working on a way for platforms to specify bindings
>> to the DMA engine code, and the DMA engine code itself selects the
>> appropriate channel.  This patch, on the other hand, introduces a set of
>> translation functions which need to be provided by platform code,
>> which returns the dma_chan pointer.
>>
>> This sounds like a recipe for a total abortion of interfaces.  Only one
>> of those two activities should be going on at any one time, or if they
>> have to occur, they need coordination so that the we don't end up with
>> two totally different schemes.
>>
>> In the mad rush to DTify everything, don't make hasty decisions, because
>> it is very difficult to change it later - especially something like this
>> which defines how DT encodes this information.
> We discussed this in KS and IMHO we need to merge these two approaches.
> 
> For DT bindings, I think the binding itself shouldn't change based on my
> work but I would like these same bindings to help build the DMA engine
> code mappings.
> 
> Now would it make sense to NOT merge these changes for 3.7 and postpone
> to 3.8. I can host these patches on a topic branch and merge them when
> we are ready. I plan to spend some good amount of time on my work this
> week so we should be ready pretty soon.
> One these changes are merged, users can start moving to this scheme.

I just wanted to see how things are progressing your side. Did you
create a topic branch for this? If so let me know where I can find it, I
did not find a branch on your infradead git tree.

I wanted to pull in the latest patches for some testing.

Cheers
Jon

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-24 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-14 22:41 [PATCH V6 0/2] of: Add generic device tree DMA helpers Jon Hunter
2012-09-14 22:41 ` [PATCH V6 1/2] " Jon Hunter
2012-09-14 22:46   ` Stephen Warren
2012-09-15  0:14   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-17 20:42     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-17 23:06       ` David Brown
2012-09-18 12:50         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-18 22:19       ` Mitch Bradley
2012-09-18 22:32         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-19 11:09         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-19 14:40           ` Mitch Bradley
2012-09-19 13:52   ` Matt Porter
2012-09-19 14:07   ` Matt Porter
2012-09-19 14:24     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-19 14:36       ` Rob Herring
2012-09-19 14:40         ` Matt Porter
2012-09-19 14:50           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-19 21:25       ` Mitch Bradley
2012-09-19 14:10   ` Rob Herring
2012-09-14 22:41 ` [PATCH V6 2/2] dmaengine: add helper function to request a slave DMA channel Jon Hunter
2012-09-17  3:33   ` Vinod Koul
2012-09-17 11:59     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-17 22:36       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-18  3:13         ` Vinod Koul
2012-09-18 13:21           ` Matt Porter
2012-09-18 15:20             ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-18 18:10               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-09-24 22:25           ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2012-09-25  4:35             ` Vinod Koul
2012-10-16  2:43               ` Shawn Guo
2012-10-16  2:39                 ` Vinod Koul
2012-11-09 20:01                   ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-16  1:37                     ` Vinod Koul
2012-11-16  8:39                       ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-11-16 15:45                       ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-28 17:06                         ` Vinod Koul
2012-12-19 17:12                       ` Jon Hunter
2012-12-20 14:57                         ` Vinod Koul
2012-09-18  3:00       ` Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5060DDEB.4000600@ti.com \
    --to=jon-hunter@ti$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox