public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jon-hunter@ti•com (Jon Hunter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 5/5] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 10:22:30 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C0C646.9000802@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121206000302.GM21682@atomide.com>


On 12/05/2012 06:03 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab•ca> [121205 15:26]:
>> On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:33:48 -0600, Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti•com> wrote:
>>> On 12/05/2012 04:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Please, be specific. Use something like "ti,am3340-gpmc" or
>>>> "ti,omap3430-gpmc". The compatible property is a list so that new
>>>> devices can claim compatibility with old. Compatible strings that are
>>>> overly generic are a pet-peave of mine.
>>>
>>> We aim to use the binding for omap2,3,4,5 as well as the am33xx devices
>>> (which are omap based). Would it be sufficient to have "ti,omap2-gpmc"
>>> implying all omap2+ based devices or should we have a compatible string
>>> for each device supported?
>>
>> Are they each register-level compatible with one another?
>>
>> The general recommended approach here is to make subsequent silicon
>> claim compatibility with the first compatible implementation.
>>
>> So, for an am3358 board:
>> 	compatible = "ti,am3358-gpmc", "ti,omap2420-gpmc";
>>
>> Essentially, what this means is that "ti,omap2420-gpmc" is the generic
>> value instead of "omap2-gpmc". The reason for this is so that the value
>> is anchored against a specific implementation, and not against something
>> completely imaginary or idealized. If a newer version isn't quite
>> compatible with the omap2420-gpmc, then it can drop the compatible claim
>> and the driver really should be told about the new device.
> 
> The compatible property can also be used to figure out which ones
> need the workarounds in patch #4 of this series for the DT case.
> So we should be specific with the compatible.

We should not merged patch #4. Daniel included this here because he is
using this on the current mainline, however, this is not needed for
linux-next and so we should drop it.

Cheers
Jon

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-06 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-05 19:09 [PATCH v7 0/5] OMAP GPMC DT bindings Daniel Mack
2012-12-05 19:09 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: don't create devices from initcall on DT Daniel Mack
2012-12-05 19:09 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] mtd: omap-nand: pass device_node in platform data Daniel Mack
2012-12-05 19:09 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] ARM: OMAP: gpmc-nand: drop __init annotation Daniel Mack
2012-12-05 19:09 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: enable hwecc for AM33xx SoCs Daniel Mack
2012-12-05 19:09 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND Daniel Mack
2012-12-05 22:22   ` Grant Likely
2012-12-05 22:33     ` Jon Hunter
2012-12-05 23:24       ` Grant Likely
2012-12-06  0:03         ` Tony Lindgren
2012-12-06 16:22           ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2012-12-06 16:54             ` Daniel Mack
2012-12-06 18:11               ` Jon Hunter
2012-12-06 16:19         ` Jon Hunter
2012-12-06 16:59           ` Daniel Mack
2012-12-12  9:13           ` Daniel Mack
2012-12-12 23:02             ` Jon Hunter
2012-12-15  0:37               ` Grant Likely
2012-12-05 19:22 ` [PATCH v7 0/5] OMAP GPMC DT bindings Jon Hunter
2012-12-05 19:24   ` Daniel Mack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50C0C646.9000802@ti.com \
    --to=jon-hunter@ti$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox