public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ben.dooks@codethink•co.uk (Ben Dooks)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] arm: fix memset-related crashes caused by recent GCC (4.7.2) optimizations
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:17:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <511935BC.8060105@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359793988-6881-1-git-send-email-ivan.djelic@parrot.com>

On 02/02/13 08:33, Ivan Djelic wrote:
> Recent GCC versions (e.g. GCC-4.7.2) perform optimizations based on
> assumptions about the implementation of memset and similar functions.
> The current ARM optimized memset code does not return the value of
> its first argument, as is usually expected from standard implementations.
>
> For instance in the following function:
>
> void debug_mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter)
> {
> 	memset(waiter, MUTEX_DEBUG_INIT, sizeof(*waiter));
> 	waiter->magic = waiter;
> 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&waiter->list);
> }
>
> compiled as:
>
> 800554d0<debug_mutex_lock_common>:
> 800554d0:       e92d4008        push    {r3, lr}
> 800554d4:       e1a00001        mov     r0, r1
> 800554d8:       e3a02010        mov     r2, #16 ; 0x10
> 800554dc:       e3a01011        mov     r1, #17 ; 0x11
> 800554e0:       eb04426e        bl      80165ea0<memset>
> 800554e4:       e1a03000        mov     r3, r0
> 800554e8:       e583000c        str     r0, [r3, #12]
> 800554ec:       e5830000        str     r0, [r3]
> 800554f0:       e5830004        str     r0, [r3, #4]
> 800554f4:       e8bd8008        pop     {r3, pc}
>
> GCC assumes memset returns the value of pointer 'waiter' in register r0; causing
> register/memory corruptions.


> @@ -43,29 +47,28 @@ ENTRY(memset)
>   #if ! CALGN(1)+0
>
>   /*
> - * We need an extra register for this loop - save the return address and
> - * use the LR
> + * We need an 2 extra registers for this loop - use r8 and the LR
>    */
> -	str	lr, [sp, #-4]!
> -	mov	ip, r1
> +	stmfd	sp!, {r8, lr}
> +	mov	r8, r1
>   	mov	lr, r1

Out of interest, why not save {r0, lr} and avoid having to
re-write the entirety of the inner loop?

>
>   2:	subs	r2, r2, #64
> -	stmgeia	r0!, {r1, r3, ip, lr}	@ 64 bytes at a time.
> -	stmgeia	r0!, {r1, r3, ip, lr}
> -	stmgeia	r0!, {r1, r3, ip, lr}
> -	stmgeia	r0!, {r1, r3, ip, lr}
> +	stmgeia	ip!, {r1, r3, r8, lr}	@ 64 bytes at a time.
> +	stmgeia	ip!, {r1, r3, r8, lr}
> +	stmgeia	ip!, {r1, r3, r8, lr}
> +	stmgeia	ip!, {r1, r3, r8, lr}
>   	bgt	2b
> -	ldmeqfd	sp!, {pc}		@ Now<64 bytes to go.
> +	ldmeqfd	sp!, {r8, pc}		@ Now<64 bytes to go.


-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-11 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-02  8:33 [PATCH] [RFC] arm: fix memset-related crashes caused by recent GCC (4.7.2) optimizations Ivan Djelic
2013-02-09 11:05 ` Ivan Djelic
2013-02-09 14:48 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-11 12:35   ` Ivan Djelic
2013-02-11 18:17 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2013-02-11 21:39   ` Ivan Djelic
2013-02-11 18:41 ` Will Deacon
2013-02-11 19:42   ` Ivan Djelic
2013-02-12 14:00     ` Will Deacon
2013-02-12 15:58       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-12 16:36         ` Will Deacon
2013-02-12 16:37           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-12 16:38             ` Will Deacon
2013-03-05 13:50           ` Dirk Behme
2013-03-06  1:42             ` Will Deacon
2013-03-06  7:05               ` Dirk Behme
2013-03-06 17:11             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-06 17:38               ` Dirk Behme
2013-03-06 18:43                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=511935BC.8060105@codethink.co.uk \
    --to=ben.dooks@codethink$(echo .)co.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox