public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: swarren@wwwdotorg•org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] ARM: tegra: get power management configurations for PMC from DT
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 13:43:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5138FBF5.8010900@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362653181.1890.3.camel@jlo-ubuntu-64.nvidia.com>

On 03/07/2013 03:46 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 02:33 +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 03/04/2013 04:40 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>> If the system supports deep sleep mode (i.e. suspend), it should have
>>> the power management configuration for PMC in the DT under the sub-node
>>> of PMC. Different system may have different configurations, it should
>>> be parsed from DT.
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pmc.c
>>
>>> @@ -143,6 +161,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id matches[] __initconst = {
>>>  static void tegra_pmc_parse_dt(void)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct device_node *np;
>>> +	u32 prop;
>>> +	enum tegra_suspend_mode suspend_mode;
>>> +	u32 core_good_time[2] = {0, 0};
>>> +	u32 lp0_vec[2] = {0, 0};
>>>  
>>>  	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches);
>>>  	BUG_ON(!np);
>>
>> This files doesn't look like that; the BUG_ON() isn't present upstream.
>> yet. So, this series depends on some other patches not yet applied. You
>> need to explicitly document your patch dependencies somewhere. Hopefully
>> I can work it out...
>>
> Sorry for that.
> 
>> The DT binding documentation patch (5/10) should be squashed into this
>> patch; both document and implement the bindings in the same patch.
> 
> IIRC, you asked me to separate the binding documentation and
> implementation into two different patch in internal review. Should I
> squash these two now? (I can do that, just want to confirm.)

I don't remember and can't find the history. I /think/ the DT binding
doc was in the same patch as the change to *.dts, and I'd asked for it
to be separated from that. It's typical to write/edit the DT binding
document in the same patch as the driver changes though. Or sometimes, a
separate patch, but earlier in the sequence than the driver code which
implements it. So yes squash please.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-07 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-04 11:40 [PATCH 03/10] ARM: tegra: get power management configurations for PMC from DT Joseph Lo
2013-03-05 18:33 ` Stephen Warren
2013-03-07 10:46   ` Joseph Lo
2013-03-07 20:43     ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-03-05 18:41 ` Stephen Warren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5138FBF5.8010900@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox