Subject: [PATCH 6/8] memory: emif: fix timings initialization issue

From: [email-masked] (Santosh Shilimkar)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:14:32 +0530

$subject is too vague. What issue ?
Some thing like "Fix the incorrect 'size' parameter in memcpy' etc

On Monday 11 March 2013 10:36 AM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Dmytryshyn <[email-masked]>
> 
> The issue was that only the first timings table was added to the
> emif platform data at the emif driver registration. All other
> timings tables was filled with zeros. Now all emif timings table
> are added to the platform data.
>
Luckily, most of the cases, first table has been re-used for
symmetric configuration.
 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Dmytryshyn <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  drivers/memory/emif.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/emif.c b/drivers/memory/emif.c
> index 02a94fc..f75806a 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/emif.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/emif.c
> @@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ static struct emif_data *__init_or_module get_device_details(
>  	if (pd->timings) {
>  		temp = devm_kzalloc(dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  		if (temp) {
> -			memcpy(temp, pd->timings, sizeof(*pd->timings));
> +			memcpy(temp, pd->timings, size);
>  			pd->timings = temp;
>  		} else {
>  			dev_warn(dev, "%s:%d: allocation error\n", __func__,
> 
Patch as such looks good to me.
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <[email-masked]>