public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: moore@free•fr (Chris Moore)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: kirkwood: DT board setup for CloudBox
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 06:54:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <515D0776.7050208@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130402172454.GT13280@titan.lakedaemon.net>

Hi,

Le 02/04/2013 19:24, Jason Cooper a ?crit :
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:54:11PM +0200, Simon Guinot wrote:
>
...

>> There is two different LaCie boards. There is no relations between this
>> boards except their final product name (which is quite silly).
>>
>>  From a LaCie point, there is no board but only product naming. Here are
>> the different names used by LaCie for this two boards/products:
>>
>> 1: netspace_mini_v2 ->  SafeBox ->  CloudBox
>> 2: FamilyBox ->  CloudBox
>>
>> "1" is the oldest board.
> Got it.

I may be thick but I didn't realise that my old black CloudBox was 
already supported under the name netspace_mini_v2 :(
There is no reference to CloudBox anywhere in the kernel; only the 
SafeBox alias (of which I was also unaware) is given in Kconfig.

>> Under Linux, with my patch we are using the following names:
>>
>> 1: netspace_mini_v2
>> 2: cloudbox
>>
>> The problem raised by Chris is that the cloudbox name could be
>> confusing because one could try a "cloudbox" dtb on the board "1". For
>> my part I don't think it is an issue because "1" is rather confidential
>> (and it is an euphemism).
> Agreed.

I wasn't aware that the original CloudBox was so confidential.
I even saw them for sale in my local FNAC (a hi-tech and media shop 
present in most large French shopping centres).

>> It would be more confusing for users if the kernel name for "2" is not
>> cloudbox but cloudbox_{color,number,...} or even familybox. Moreover
>> netspace_mini_v2 is a correct name for "1".
>>
>> IMHO, we could let things as they are. Additionally, I could either
>> extend the Kconfig description and add a some comments in the dts files,
>> in order to to prevent any misunderstanding...
>>
>> Let me know if you agree or not.
> Yes, that makes more sense.  Thanks for clearing it up.  Please add the
> clarifying remarks to the dts.

I agree that it would be confusing to change the netspace_mini_v2 name now.

In view of all the above, please disregard my objection.
Sorry for the noise :(

> As for the model number for the public board (#2), why can't we append
> "-90003xx"?  See [1], Specifications tab.
>
> [1] http://www.lacie.com/us/products/product.htm?id=10597

This seems like a good idea to me but I don't think Simon favoured 
adding a model number.
In any case Simon would know better than me whether this covers the 
models correctly.
What do you think, Simon?

Cheers,
Chris

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-04  4:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-29 11:06 [PATCH] ARM: kirkwood: DT board setup for CloudBox Simon Guinot
2013-03-29 15:31 ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-29 18:41   ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-30  6:51     ` Chris Moore
2013-03-30 15:08       ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-01 16:44         ` Simon Guinot
2013-04-01 16:33       ` Simon Guinot
2013-04-02  4:17         ` Chris Moore
2013-04-02 11:04           ` Simon Guinot
2013-04-02 11:45           ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-02 12:54             ` Simon Guinot
2013-04-02 17:24               ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-04  4:54                 ` Chris Moore [this message]
2013-04-04  8:00                   ` Simon Guinot
2013-04-04  9:34                     ` Simon Guinot
2013-04-05  1:11                       ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-05  5:14                         ` Chris Moore
2013-04-08 17:00                           ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-29 17:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2013-03-29 18:51   ` Simon Guinot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=515D0776.7050208@free.fr \
    --to=moore@free$(echo .)fr \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox