From: tangchen@cn•fujitsu.com (Tang Chen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] mm: vmemmap: add vmemmap_verify check for hot-add node/memory case
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:41:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51666930.6090702@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQVaByGOTjLVthRkEze_ekXm5LAKgKdHzrD+q1iYmjgZFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Yinghai,
(Add cc Liu Jiang.)
On 04/09/2013 02:40 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Lin Feng<linfeng@cn•fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> In hot add node(memory) case, vmemmap pages are always allocated from other
>> node,
>
> that is broken, and should be fixed.
> vmemmap should be on local node even for hot add node.
>
I want some info sharing. :)
Here is the work I'm trying to do.
1. As most of people don't like movablemem_map idea, we decide to
drop "specifying physical address" thing, and restart a new solution
to support using SRAT info only.
We want to modify movablecore to support "movablecore=acpi" to
enable/disable limiting hotpluggable memory in ZONE_MOVABLE.
And we dropped all the old design and data structures.
2. As Liu Jiang mentioned before, we can add a flag to memblock to mark
special memory. Since we are dropping all the old data structures,
I think I want to reuse his idea to reserve movable memory with memblock
when booting.
3. If we add flag to memblock, we can mark different memory. And I remember
you mentioned before that we can use memblock to reserve local node
data
for node-life-cycle data, like vmemmap, pagetable.
So are you doing the similar work now ?
If not, I think I can merge it into mine, and push a new patch-set with
hot-add, hot-remove code modified to support putting vmemmap,
pagetable,
pgdat, page_cgroup, ..., on local node.
If you are doing the similar work, I will only finish my work and wait
for your patch.
Thanks. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-11 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-08 9:56 [PATCH 0/2] mm: vmemmap: add vmemmap_verify check for hot-add node/memory case Lin Feng
2013-04-08 9:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: vmemmap: x86: add vmemmap_verify check for hot-add node case Lin Feng
2013-04-08 10:23 ` Lin Feng
2013-04-08 9:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: vmemmap: arm64: " Lin Feng
2013-04-08 10:55 ` Will Deacon
2013-04-09 2:07 ` Lin Feng
2013-04-08 18:40 ` [PATCH 0/2] mm: vmemmap: add vmemmap_verify check for hot-add node/memory case Yinghai Lu
2013-04-08 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2013-04-09 1:58 ` Lin Feng
2013-04-09 2:02 ` Lin Feng
2013-04-11 7:41 ` Tang Chen [this message]
2013-04-11 15:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-04-12 1:13 ` Tang Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51666930.6090702@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=tangchen@cn$(echo .)fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox