Subject: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: at91: suspend both memory controllers on at91sam9263

From: [email-masked] (Nicolas Ferre)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:19:49 +0200

On 04/18/2013 04:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann :
> On Thursday 18 April 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> 
>>> This patch blindly removes the warning and changes the
>>> at91sam9263 to use the same code at at91sam9g45, which
>>> may or may not be the right solution. If it is not,
>>> maybe someone could provide a better fix.
>>
>> Maybe you can remove this paragraph: now you are using the proper fix
>> with proper RAM type.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email-masked]>
>>> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <[email-masked]>
>>
>> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email-masked]>
>>
>> What is the future of this patch series: do you want us to take this
>> patch separately or to you want to apply the whole series on the arm-soc
>> tree?
> 
> I'd prefer if you could just apply or forward it to an appropriate tree.
> 
> Most of the other patches have found their way into mainline by now.
> 
>>> Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <[email-masked]>
>>> Cc: Andrew Victor <[email-masked]>
>>> Cc: Albin Tonnerre <[email-masked]>
>>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <[email-masked]>
>>
>> Moreover, this patch my conflict with Daniel's current initiative to
>> move cpuidle driver to its own directory: how do we coordinate with each
>> other?
> 
> Maybe you can make sure it actually works and send it to Daniel to apply on
> top of his other patches?

Well, as Daniel's patches are still under construction, I stack this one
on the at91-3.10-soc branch and let Daniel rebase his work on top of a
3.10-rc1-ish tree...

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre