Subject: [PATCH v6 01/16] spi/spi-atmel: fix probing failure after xfer->speed_hz set

From: [email-masked] (Nicolas Ferre)
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 11:31:24 +0200

On 07/05/2013 03:11, Yang, Wenyou :
> Hi, Mark
> 
>> From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie at kernel.org]
>> Sent: 2013?5?6? 18:31
>> To: Ferre, Nicolas
>> Cc: grant.likely at secretlab.ca; Grant Likely; Richard Genoud; Yang, Wenyou;
>> Joachim Eastwood; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
>> plagnioj at jcrosoft.com; Lin, JM; spi-devel-general at lists.sourceforge.net;
>> linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/16] spi/spi-atmel: fix probing failure after
>> xfer->speed_hz set
>>
>> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:34:55PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>
>>> Can you tell us if this SPI patch will be merged upstream using one of
>>> your paths?
>>
>> I have no idea what patch this is but if it's not in my tree -next it's unlikely to be
>> merged.
> This is dropped patch, no need to be merged.
> 
> We tested Atmel spi in your tree-next , but it doesn't work, the reason is the Joachim Eastwood's patch is not included.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2165301/
> which Joachim said that Grant said he applied.

Hi Wenyou,

Sorry for not having communicating with you after Mark told me the story
about this patch: Mark merged Grant's material in his SPI tree (with is
the official one nowadays). You can see that by browsing linux-next:

 Merge remote-tracking branch 'spi/fix/grant' into spi-linus

Joachim's patch is well included in it. We still have to monitor
inclusion of it in Linus' tree...

Mark, sorry for the noise.

Bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre