Subject: [RFC 4/4] DRM: tda998x: add missing include

From: [email-masked] (Sebastian Hesselbarth)
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 20:21:25 +0200

On 05/18/2013 07:46 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:19 +0200
> Sebastian Hesselbarth<[email-masked]>  wrote:
>
>> The RFC sent by Russell King was missing an include for tda998x. This
>> is just a compatible clone to remember Russell to add that later.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth<[email-masked]>
...
> These parameters should not be there. It seems to me that the DT is the
> right place.

True, but if you just read the description above:
"RFC sent by Russell King was missing an include for tda998x".

You want to test the RFC, you need that include.

Sebastian