public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kgene.kim@samsung•com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/18] pwm: Add new pwm-samsung driver
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 01:41:17 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C9C82D.6010808@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1688471.WOi6pAAcEq@amdc1227>

On 06/25/13 20:19, Tomasz Figa wrote:

[...]

>>>>> /*
>>>>>
>>>>>   * PWM block is shared between pwm-samsung and samsung_pwm_timer
>>>>>   drivers
>>>>>   * and some registers need access synchronization. If both drivers
>>>>>   are
>>>>>   * compiled in, the spinlock is defined in the clocksource driver,
>>>>>   * otherwise following definition is used.
>>>>>   *
>>>>>   * Currently we do not need any more complex synchronization method
>>>>>   * because all the supported SoCs contain only one instance of the
>>>>>   PWM
>>>>>   * IP. Should this change, both drivers will need to be modified to
>>>>>   * properly synchronize accesses to particular instances.
>>>>>   */
>>>>
>>>> I see that you can't be persuaded. And everybody else seems to be
>>>> okay
>>>> with it so... have it your way. I'm probably going to regret this.
>>>
>>> This was just a proposal. Do you want anything else to be added to the
>>> comment or anything to be changed?
>>
>> For reference, I still don't like this but since I'm the only one
>> complaining, go ahead. With that comment added to the driver:
>>
>> Acked-by: Thierry Reding<thierry.reding@gmail•com>
>
> OK. Thank you.
>
> Kukjin, can you amend the comment I mentioned to this patch above the line
> with DEFINE_SPINLOCK or I should send fixed version?
>
Tomasz, please re-send this one with fixing it but I'm not sure this can 
be sent for upcoming merge window because it's a little bit late. 
Anyway, let me try it.

Thanks,
- Kukjin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-25 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-20 22:12 [PATCH v2 00/18] Final Samsung PWM support cleanup Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 01/18] ARM: SAMSUNG: Unify base address definitions of timer block Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 02/18] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add new PWM platform device Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 03/18] ARM: SAMSUNG: Set PWM platform data Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 04/18] clocksource: samsung_pwm_timer: Cache clocksource register address Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/18] clocksource: samsung_pwm_timer: Do not use clocksource_mmio Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/18] clocksource: samsung_pwm_timer: Handle suspend/resume correctly Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 07/18] ARM: SAMSUNG: Move all platforms to new clocksource driver Tomasz Figa
2013-06-24 15:33   ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-24 15:38     ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-24 15:46       ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-24 15:49         ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 08/18] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove old samsung-time driver Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 09/18] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove unused PWM timer IRQ chip code Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 10/18] pwm: samsung: Rename to pwm-samsung-legacy Tomasz Figa
2013-06-22 13:09   ` [PATCH v3 " Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 11/18] pwm: Add new pwm-samsung driver Tomasz Figa
2013-06-22 13:06   ` [PATCH v3 " Tomasz Figa
2013-06-24 15:22     ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-24 15:37       ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-24 17:49       ` Thierry Reding
2013-06-24 18:31         ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-24 20:13           ` Thierry Reding
2013-06-24 20:32             ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-24 20:53               ` Thierry Reding
2013-06-24 21:17                 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-25 10:26                   ` Thierry Reding
2013-06-25 11:19                     ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-25 15:18                       ` Mark Brown
2013-06-25 16:41                       ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2013-06-25 16:30         ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-20 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 12/18] ARM: SAMSUNG: Rework private data handling in dev-backlight Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 13/18] ARM: SAMSUNG: Modify board files to use new PWM platform device Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 14/18] pwm: Remove superseded pwm-samsung-legacy driver Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:13 ` [PATCH v2 15/18] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove old PWM timer platform devices Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:13 ` [PATCH v2 16/18] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove pwm-clock infrastructure Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:13 ` [PATCH v2 17/18] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining uses of plat/regs-timer.h header Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 22:13 ` [PATCH v2 18/18] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove " Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 00/18] Final Samsung PWM support cleanup Tomasz Figa
2013-06-21 14:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-22 13:10   ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-22 18:01 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-22 18:04   ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-24  0:14     ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-22 19:34   ` Sylwester Nawrocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51C9C82D.6010808@samsung.com \
    --to=kgene.kim@samsung$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox