Subject: [PATCH 05/22] ARM: dts: bcm281xx: Remove '0x's from BCM11351 BRT DTS file

From: [email-masked] (Arend van Spriel)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:53:53 +0200

On 07/22/2013 03:38 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Christian Daudt wrote:
>
>> On 13-07-22 03:52 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> Cc: Christian Daudt <[email-masked]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email-masked]>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts | 6 +++---
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts
>>> index 67ec524..fdace5d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm11351-brt.dts
>>> @@ -27,18 +27,18 @@
>>>   		status = "okay";
>>>   	};
>>> -	sdio0: sdio at 0x3f180000 {
>>> +	sdio0: sdio at 3f180000 {
>>>   		max-frequency = <48000000>;
>>>   		status = "okay";
>>>   	};
>>> -	sdio1: sdio at 0x3f190000 {
>>> +	sdio1: sdio at 3f190000 {
>>>   		non-removable;
>>>   		max-frequency = <48000000>;
>>>   		status = "okay";
>>>   	};
>>> -	sdio3: sdio at 0x3f1b0000 {
>>> +	sdio3: sdio at 3f1b0000 {
>>>   		max-frequency = <48000000>;
>>>   		status = "okay";
>>>   	};
>> Hi Lee,
>>   Is this convention documented ? Someone called my attention to the
>> fact that this dts files was inconsistent in its use of 0x in names,
>> but I was not aware of a coding guideline for this.
>
> The best two places I can think of are:
>
> Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txt
> and
> http://www.devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage

And even those do not stick to a single convention, but that is what can 
be expected of a twiki page :-p

Regards,
Arend