public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arend@broadcom•com (Arend van Spriel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] bcm53xx: initial support for the BCM5301/BCM470X SoC with ARM CPU
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:14:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51EED629.1000404@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGVrzcbA72AYu6J3JXBirQQeTiDH9cJThdBdH=Q=gJtOnqz-AA@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/23/2013 08:56 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> If you want to add more confusion, because there is,
> drivers/staging/bcm which stands for Beceem has been later acquired by
> Broadcom, eventually turning this 3 letter word into something
> "consistent" from a Broadcom point of view. As far as I am concerned,
> I would just stick with the allocated vendor prefix and replace "bcm"
> with "brcm" because the allocated one is the authoritative one.

Nice, huh. In device-tree notation it identifies the vendor and I agree 
that brcm is a better/preferred vendor id. The confusion here is that 
the device identifiers are all prefixed with "bcm", which is something 
different than the vendor id. I do not think consistency was the goal in 
the acquisition of Beceem ;-)

>> >
>>> >>the bcm281x/kona family support code be merged and use "bcm" there, without
>>> >>registering it. Besides, a simple rule of number here wins:
>>> >>
>>> >>git grep "brcm," * | wc -l
>>> >>63
>>> >>git grep "bcm," * | wc -l
>>> >>25
>>> >>
>>> >>(as of Linux 3.11-rc1)
>>> >>
>>> >>So consistency we should get the bcm281x/kona DT bindings to rename their
>>> >>vendor prefix as well.
>> >
>> >I believe getting this "right" is far more important than the difference
>> >in churn of a mere 38 instances of use of brcm. "Right" is two things:
>> >1) it needs to be consistent 2) it should be what makes sense.
> I agree, which is the reason why I would stick with the vendor prefix
> and end the story there.

Agree.

> --
> Florian

Regards,
Arend

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-23 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-16 13:52 [PATCH] bcm53xx: initial support for the BCM5301/BCM470X SoC with ARM CPU Hauke Mehrtens
2013-07-16 15:14 ` Matt Porter
2013-07-16 15:39   ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-07-16 18:13     ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-07-16 23:52       ` Matt Porter
2013-07-16 23:44     ` Matt Porter
2013-07-16 23:08   ` Florian Fainelli
2013-07-16 23:42     ` Matt Porter
2013-07-19  2:06     ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-07-23 18:57       ` Matt Porter
2013-07-23 19:05         ` Florian Fainelli
2013-07-24 23:11           ` Domenico Andreoli
     [not found]             ` <CAGVrzcYudfgqs_eafje4BT2z2qE0kSJPx1B-xrq0WxtUkGxSFw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-07-26  0:04               ` Matt Porter
2013-07-26 22:16                 ` Christian Daudt
2013-07-26 22:29                   ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-07-26 22:30                   ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-29  9:30                     ` Mark Rutland
2013-07-29 13:20                       ` Matt Porter
2013-07-29 17:06                         ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-30 23:08                           ` Christian Daudt
2013-07-23 18:49     ` Matt Porter
2013-07-23 18:56       ` Florian Fainelli
2013-07-23 19:14         ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2013-07-23 19:22         ` Matt Porter
2013-07-24  0:10           ` Christian Daudt
     [not found]             ` <CADjby3WGW6f=1Vdm2kx+Re0KrjFRaC3dQOumpnS6_sp2yb5NfQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-07-24 19:21               ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-07-24 22:54                 ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-07-25 20:33                   ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-07-25 21:37                     ` Christian Daudt
2013-07-25 21:58                       ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-07-19 13:03   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-16 15:20 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-07-16 15:35   ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-07-19  1:36     ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-07-23 22:10       ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-07-16 23:19   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-07-19  2:23 ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-07-23 21:54   ` Hauke Mehrtens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51EED629.1000404@broadcom.com \
    --to=arend@broadcom$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox