public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: s.nawrocki@samsung•com (Sylwester Nawrocki)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/1] ARM: EXYNOS: Update CONFIG_ARCH_NR_GPIO for Exynos
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:44:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51EFB023.6090804@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374655405-22998-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org>

Hi Sachin,

On 07/24/2013 10:43 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> With the recent cleanup in Exynos platform code notably commits
> 17859bec ("ARM: EXYNOS: Do not select legacy Kconfig symbols any
> more") and b9222210 ("ARM: EXYNOS: Remove mach/gpio.h"), the definition
> of ARCH_NR_GPIOS got removed. This started causing problems on SoCs like
> Exynos4412 which have more than the default number of GPIOs. Thus define
> this number in KConfig file which takes care of current SoC requirements
> and provides scope for GPIO expanders. Without this patch we get the
> following errors during boot:
> 
> gpiochip_add: gpios 251..258 (gpv0) failed to register
> samsung-pinctrl 106e0000.pinctrl: failed to register gpio_chip gpv0,
> error code: -22
> samsung-pinctrl: probe of 106e0000.pinctrl failed with error -22
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro•org>
> Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung•com>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> Rearranged different default values in single line.
> ---
>  arch/arm/Kconfig |    3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index f8fb910..ac9fa38 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -1590,8 +1590,7 @@ config ARM_PSCI
>  config ARCH_NR_GPIO
>  	int
>  	default 1024 if ARCH_SHMOBILE || ARCH_TEGRA
> -	default 512 if SOC_OMAP5
> -	default 512 if ARCH_KEYSTONE
> +	default 512 if ARCH_EXYNOS || ARCH_KEYSTONE || SOC_OMAP5

Sorry, 512 seems a bit too generous to me. Also I would rather
leave each SOC/ARCH on a separate line.

Almost half of those 512 entries would have been unused in most
cases. How about, e.g. 352 ? If anyone finds this value too low
they could always submit a patch like this one. IMHO with 352 or
392 there would be sufficient margin.

--
Regards,
Sylwester

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-24 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-24  8:43 [PATCH v4 1/1] ARM: EXYNOS: Update CONFIG_ARCH_NR_GPIO for Exynos Sachin Kamat
2013-07-24 10:44 ` Sylwester Nawrocki [this message]
2013-07-24 10:49   ` Sachin Kamat
2013-07-24 11:01     ` Kukjin Kim
2013-07-24 12:00     ` Kukjin Kim
2013-07-24 12:23       ` Sylwester Nawrocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51EFB023.6090804@samsung.com \
    --to=s.nawrocki@samsung$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox