public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: james.hogan@imgtec•com (James Hogan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/5] clk: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:55:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F1202D.9060403@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51F11B46.7010900@samsung.com>

Hi Sylwester

On 25/07/13 13:34, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 06/13/2013 06:06 PM, James Hogan wrote:
>> Add a CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT clock flag, which will prevent muxes
>> being reparented during clk_set_rate.
>>
>> To avoid breaking existing platforms, all callers of clk_register_mux()
>> are adjusted to pass the new flag. Platform maintainers are encouraged
>> to remove the flag if they wish to allow mux reparenting on set_rate.
> [..]
>> Changes in v3:
>>
>> * rename/invert CLK_SET_RATE_REMUX to CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT and move
>>   to this new patch.
>> * patch 3: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag to all callers of
>>   clk_register_mux. If you don't mind your clocks being reparented in
>>   response to set_rate please let me know and I'll drop the relevant
>>   portion of the patch.
> 
> Why is this better to change current behaviour of the clock core
> and modify all drivers instead of having, e.g. CLK_SET_RATE_REPARENT
> set in drivers of hardware that supports clock re-parenting while
> setting clock rate ?

See this message from Mike Turquette which first suggested it:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136847508109344&w=2

> Is there intention to just have the automatic clock re-parenting
> as a default feature in the common clock API ?

Yes, that would be the result (except where explicitly disallowed).
Unfortunately where such policy should ideally be defined is still up in
the air.

It's not a property of the hardware, but then it is arguably a property
of the environment the bootloader has configured (like the stuff in the
/chosen device tree node).

Presuming that the usual reason not to reparent a mux is because other
important clocks depend on it, the kernel might know enough to work out
whether it's safe (unless of course there are other cores/threads in the
SoC using the clock that Linux isn't aware of, which brings us back to
it being a bootloader environment thing).

> My apologies if this has already been answered, I haven't been
> following this thread.

No problem :)

Cheers
James

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-25 12:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-13 16:05 [PATCH v5 0/5] clk: implement remuxing during set_rate James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] clk: abstract parent cache James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] clk: move some parent related functions upwards James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:06 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] clk: add support for clock reparent on set_rate James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:06 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] clk: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag James Hogan
2013-07-25 12:34   ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-07-25 12:55     ` James Hogan [this message]
2013-07-25 18:05       ` Mike Turquette
2013-06-13 16:06 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] clk: clk-mux: implement remuxing on set_rate James Hogan
2013-06-21 17:04 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] clk: implement remuxing during set_rate Mike Turquette
2013-06-21 21:27   ` James Hogan
2013-07-24 18:39     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-25  9:07       ` James Hogan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51F1202D.9060403@imgtec.com \
    --to=james.hogan@imgtec$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox