public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti•com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: mm: LPAE: Correct virt_to_phys patching for 64 bit physical addresses
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 10:38:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51FFB8D5.8070506@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1308040126560.14472@syhkavp.arg>

On Sunday 04 August 2013 01:32 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Aug 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> 
>> On Saturday 03 August 2013 10:01 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>> On Sat, 3 Aug 2013, Sricharan R wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday 03 August 2013 08:58 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>>>> ... meaning that, instead of using 0x81 for the stub value on the mov 
>>>>> instruction, it only has to be 0x83.  Bits 7 and 0 still act as anchors 
>>>>> for the rotation field in the opcode, while bit 1 indicates which value 
>>>>> to patch in.
>>>>   I started with this kind of augmenting with the immediate operand
>>>>   while starting V2. But the problem was, we do the runtime patching twice.
>>>
>>> Ahhh... Bummer.
>>>
>> Sorry if it wasn't clear but I thought we discussed why patching is
>> done twice.
> 
> Yeah, I know the reasons.  I just had forgotten about the effects on the 
> anchor bits.
>
I see.
 
>> This was purely based on the discussion where RMK suggested to follow 
>> that approach to minimize code changes.
>>  
>> Looks like we need to revisit that now based on Russell's latest
>> comment.
> 
> Note that my comments on this particular patch are still valid and 
> independent from whatever approach is used globally to deal with the 
> memory alias.  I do think that the value to patch should be selected 
> depending on the opcode's rotation field which makes it compatible with 
> a double patching approach as well.
> 
Completely agree.

Regards,
Santosh

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-05 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-31 16:44 [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM: mm: Extend the runtime patch stub for PAE systems Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-31 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: mm: LPAE: use phys_addr_t appropriately in p2v and v2p conversions Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-31 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ARM: mm: Introduce virt_to_idmap() with an arch hook Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-03  1:53   ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-03 19:03     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-31 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] ARM: mm: Move the idmap print to appropriate place in the code Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-03  1:55   ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-31 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: mm: LPAE: Correct virt_to_phys patching for 64 bit physical addresses Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-31 18:31   ` Sricharan R
2013-08-03  3:32     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-03  3:28   ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-03 12:47     ` Sricharan R
2013-08-03 14:01       ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-03 19:25         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-04  5:32           ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-05 14:38             ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-08-03 14:05       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-03 14:09         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-03 19:15           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-09 19:37             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-31 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] ARM: mm: Update runtime patching code to THUMB2 mode Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-03  3:40   ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-03 12:51     ` Sricharan R
2013-07-31 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] ARM: mm: Recreate kernel mappings in early_paging_init() Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM: mm: Extend the runtime patch stub for PAE systems Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-03 19:02   ` Santosh Shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51FFB8D5.8070506@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox