From: kgene.kim@samsung•com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] Common Clock Framework support for Samsung S3C64xx
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 03:13:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51FFEB63.6060901@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130805180625.5348.79570@quantum>
On 08/06/13 03:06, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-08-05 10:01:36)
>> On 07/23/13 08:49, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> This series is an attempt to move clock support on Samsung S3C64xx SoCs
>>> to Common Clock Framework.
>>>
>>> First, support for PLL types present on S3C64xx SoCs is added to Samsung
>>> Common Clock Framework driver. Then the main clock driver for mentioned
>>> SoCs is introduced. Further patches contain fixes for drivers to make them
>>> compliant with CCF semantics, migration of platform code to use the new
>>> clock driver and removal of old clock management code.
>>>
>>> Depends on:
>>> - [PATCH v4 00/20] Samsung PWM support cleanup
>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/20856
>>>
>>> On S3C6410-based Tiny6410 board (Mini6410-compatible):
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Tomasz Figa<tomasz.figa@gmail•com>
>>>
>>> For v1:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro•org>
>>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - added patch for read-only muxes,
>>> - exported configurable muxes and dividers,
>>> - defined mout_syncmux as read-only mux,
>>> - in DT-enabled case fixed-clock binding is used to define external clocks.
>>>
>>> Tomasz Figa (8):
>>> clk: mux: Add support for read-only muxes.
>>> clk: samsung: pll: Add support for PLL6552 and PLL6553
>>> clk: samsung: Add clock driver for S3C64xx SoCs
>>> ARM: SAMSUNG: Add soc_is_s3c6400/s3c6410 macros
>>> ARM: s3c64xx: dma: Use clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare
>>> usb: host: ohci-s3c2410 Use clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare
>>> ARM: s3c64xx: Migrate clock handling to Common Clock Framework
>>> ARM: s3c64xx: Remove old clock management code
>>>
>>> .../bindings/clock/samsung,s3c64xx-clock.txt | 77 ++
>>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/clock.c | 1007 --------------------
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/common.c | 21 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/common.h | 12 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dma.c | 4 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/include/mach/regs-clock.h | 132 +--
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-anw6410.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-hmt.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-mini6410.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-ncp.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq.c | 11 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6400.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/pm.c | 21 -
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/s3c6400.c | 6 -
>>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/s3c6410.c | 7 -
>>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h | 4 +
>>> drivers/clk/clk-mux.c | 10 +-
>>> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 160 ++++
>>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h | 4 +
>>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c64xx.c | 465 +++++++++
>>> drivers/usb/host/ohci-s3c2410.c | 8 +-
>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s3c64xx-clock.h | 178 ++++
>>> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 2 +
>>> 28 files changed, 943 insertions(+), 1205 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c64xx-clock.txt
>>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/clock.c
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c64xx.c
>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s3c64xx-clock.h
>>>
>> Basically, this series looks good to me, but I'm not sure how this
>> should be handled because of dependency with PWM cleanup and clk stuff
>> in clk tree now...
>
> Patches 1-3 can go into the clk tree. 4-6 should go through their
> respective trees.
>
> If you want I can take 7& 8 through the clk tree.
>
> Alternatively I can provide patches 1-3 in a separate stable topic
> branch for you to pull in as a dependency. We'll both merge that stable
> topic branch into our trees and you can make a note of it for the
> arm-soc folks.
>
Thanks for your quick response. Would be helpful to samsung tree if you
could provide a separate stable topic branch what you suggested for clk
stuff in this series.
Of course, I will inform when I send pull-request for this series to
arm-soc.
Thanks,
Kukjin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-05 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-22 23:49 [PATCH v2 0/8] Common Clock Framework support for Samsung S3C64xx Tomasz Figa
2013-07-22 23:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] clk: mux: Add support for read-only muxes Tomasz Figa
2013-07-23 11:22 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-07-23 11:25 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-07-27 12:41 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-02 21:46 ` Mike Turquette
2013-07-22 23:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] clk: samsung: pll: Add support for PLL6552 and PLL6553 Tomasz Figa
2013-07-23 23:52 ` [PATCH v3 " Tomasz Figa
2013-07-28 12:30 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-28 12:38 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-02 22:53 ` Mike Turquette
2013-07-22 23:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] clk: samsung: Add clock driver for S3C64xx SoCs Tomasz Figa
2013-07-23 23:55 ` [PATCH v3 " Tomasz Figa
2013-07-22 23:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add soc_is_s3c6400/s3c6410 macros Tomasz Figa
2013-07-22 23:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] ARM: s3c64xx: dma: Use clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare Tomasz Figa
2013-07-28 12:32 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-22 23:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] usb: host: ohci-s3c2410 " Tomasz Figa
2013-07-23 0:15 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-07-23 0:44 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-07-31 18:58 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-07-31 20:44 ` Alan Stern
2013-08-01 7:45 ` Greg KH
2013-07-22 23:49 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] ARM: s3c64xx: Migrate clock handling to Common Clock Framework Tomasz Figa
2013-07-22 23:49 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] ARM: s3c64xx: Remove old clock management code Tomasz Figa
2013-07-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Common Clock Framework support for Samsung S3C64xx Kukjin Kim
2013-08-05 17:01 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-08-05 18:06 ` Mike Turquette
2013-08-05 18:13 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2013-08-05 19:02 ` Mike Turquette
2013-08-05 23:42 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-06 19:47 ` Mike Turquette
2013-08-06 22:06 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-06 22:11 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-08-06 22:13 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-16 10:44 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-16 21:02 ` Mike Turquette
2013-08-16 21:15 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-17 10:30 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-08-20 0:22 ` Mike Turquette
2013-08-20 7:09 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-08-25 17:19 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-08-21 0:33 ` [PATCH] clk: samsung: pll: Use new registration method for PLL6552 and PLL6553 Tomasz Figa
2013-08-27 1:14 ` Mike Turquette
2013-08-27 17:16 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-08-27 23:45 ` Mike Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51FFEB63.6060901@samsung.com \
--to=kgene.kim@samsung$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox