Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: choose appropriate handler for level interrupts

From: [email-masked] (Nicolas Ferre)
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:18:09 +0200

On 29/07/2013 17:42, Linus Walleij :
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Boris BREZILLON
> <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>> The current implementation handle both edge and level interrupts with the
>> 'handle_simple_irq' handler.
>>
>> Level interrupts are active as long as the pin stays at the configured
>> level (low or high). In this case we have to use 'handle_level_irq' which
>> mask the interrupt until the handle has treated it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <[email-masked]>
>
> Nicolas/Jean-Christophe: any opinion on this patch?

Back online:

Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email-masked]>

(maybe too late though)

Thanks for fixing this.

Bye,

> I am tempted to just apply it and see if you react to it :-)
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>

-- 
Nicolas Ferre