From: linux@roeck-us•net (Guenter Roeck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:41:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520B9700.7010105@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8u_c=seOQ+y44H2Vpefyx4EisiZ-ZqBxuPsyoYjCt3vQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/14/2013 05:44 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 14 August 2013 11:33, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm•linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it,
>>> or do we need a test on real hardware ?
>>
>> Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing
>> to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another
>> change to this.
>>
>> Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so
>> it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff.
>
> Yes, I definitely think we should test on the hardware before we
> land yet another change to this PCI code that hasn't really been
> thoroughly tested on anything. I have the board/backplane on my
Agreed.
> desk but it'll be later in the week before I can do the testing
> (currently still messing with uboot config to get it to actually
> boot a kernel).
>
That would be great. Thanks a lot for your help!
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-14 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-11 15:54 SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ Guenter Roeck
2013-08-11 22:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 0:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 16:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 16:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 17:33 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 20:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 21:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 21:36 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 22:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 22:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 23:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-14 10:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:44 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 12:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:56 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 14:41 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-08-12 17:48 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 8:37 ` Rob Landley
2013-08-13 9:12 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-13 3:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 16:45 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 17:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 18:05 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 18:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 20:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 21:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 22:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 22:23 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 23:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-19 15:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 19:02 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-08-12 20:58 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520B9700.7010105@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us$(echo .)net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox