Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx6q: refactor some ldb related clocks

From: [email-masked] (Liu Ying)
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:20:45 +0800

On 08/20/2013 11:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Liu Ying <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt
>> index 5a90a72..90e923e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt
>> @@ -89,8 +89,6 @@ clocks and IDs.
>>         gpu3d_shader            74
>>         ipu1_podf               75
>>         ipu2_podf               76
>> -       ldb_di0_podf            77
>> -       ldb_di1_podf            78
>>         ipu1_di0_pre            79
>>         ipu1_di1_pre            80
>>         ipu2_di0_pre            81
> 
> This causes a 'hole' in the clock numbering scheme: 74, 75, 76, 79, 80, etc
> 

I find there is a 'hole' in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx5-clock.txt as well.
The 'hole' was taken by tve_di(26) clock before.

Is this more acceptable?

ldb_di0_podf_unused            77
ldb_di1_podf_unused            78

Liu Ying