public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: r.sricharan@ti•com (Sricharan R)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] misc: Add crossbar driver
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:03:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5215F6F6.9060703@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdagSHxzV3=427O9iftNxM+N=w9aPds=iDvGQPoG3H-cWw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Linus,

On Thursday 22 August 2013 02:40 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
> <santosh.shilimkar@ti•com> wrote:
>> On Thursday 15 August 2013 04:51 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> (...)
>>> Sorry I don't understand what thread that is... can you point me there?
>>> My previous statement on this issue what this:
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137442541628641&w=2
> (...)
>>>> I don't see how you can make this happen with an irqchip
>>>> infrastructure.
>>> I think my post above describes this.
>>>
>> Sorry for being dumb but I don't think cascaded irqchip examples
>> like GPIO and cross-bars are same. If you take an example of
>> GPIO irqchip, it always have a physical connection even if it
>> is 1 IRQ line for (32 logical/sparse IRQs). That goes with
>> other MFD examples too.
>>
>> So may be I am still missing something in your proposal.
> Why does it matter if it is a GPIO or MFD or whatever?
> The point is that the IRQ line passes thru something else,
> and this we model as an irqdomain.
>
> Anyway here is a silicon cascaded IRQ chip:
> arch/arm/mach-versatile/core.c
> See versatile_init_irq():
>
> __vic_init(VA_VIC_BASE, IRQ_VIC_START, ~0, 0, np);
> (...)
> fpga_irq_init(VA_SIC_BASE, "SIC", IRQ_SIC_START,
>                 IRQ_VICSOURCE31, PIC_VALID, np);
>
> The VIC in the versatile has the SIC cascaded from one of
> its IRQ lines. Both the VIC and SIC (fpga IRQ) are
> using irqdomains so the SIC spawns a child irqdomain
> from IRQ 31 (last IRQ) of the VIC.
 Ok, this is a typical example of irqchip cascaded.
> The difference with a crossbar is that it can software-config
> which IRQ goes where, and does not have a callback
> to clear interrupts or anything like that, it just passes them
> thru. But it is best modeled as an irqdomain IMO.
We can model crossbar as irqchip and gic as its interrupt parent
and peripherals to have crossbar as interrupt-parent.
   
 peripherals will do request_irq(crossbar_number)
              |
              |
 crossbar_unmask()
              |
              |
 maps crossbar number<->  to interrupt number and
 calls request_irq(int_no, crossbar_handler,..)

 
 crossbar_handler(interrupt number)
            |
            |
 get crossbar number from interrupt number
            |
            |
 handle_irq(crossbar_domain(crossbar number))
                                                                             

So this means a extra dummy handler.
Also the concern is by modelling it as irqchip, we will have
to find a different solution for DMA crossbar.

Regards,
 Sricharan

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-22 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-18 16:43 [PATCH 0/3] Add crossbar driver Sricharan R
2013-07-18 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] misc: " Sricharan R
2013-07-18 16:55   ` Joe Perches
2013-07-18 18:25   ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-21 16:33     ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-18 18:56   ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-18 23:39     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-19  0:13       ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-19 10:48         ` Sricharan R
2013-07-19  7:17       ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-19 10:48         ` Sricharan R
2013-07-21 16:49     ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-22 12:20       ` Sricharan R
2013-07-22 16:23         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-24 16:08           ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-24 16:38             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-24 16:47               ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-24 18:43                 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-24 18:51                   ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-24 18:59                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-13  8:10                       ` Tony Lindgren
2013-08-13  9:56                         ` Sricharan R
2013-08-13 13:29                           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-15 20:01                           ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-15 20:26                             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-15 20:51                               ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-15 21:14                                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-21 21:10                                   ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-22 11:33                                     ` Sricharan R [this message]
2013-08-22 13:45                                       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-23  4:47                                       ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-23  6:11                                         ` Sricharan R
2013-08-23  6:17                                           ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-23  6:36                                           ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-23  6:53                                             ` Sricharan R
2013-08-23  8:14                                               ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-23 13:38                                                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-23 16:28                                                   ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-23 19:06                                                     ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-23 19:44                                                       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-13 13:28                         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-14  7:27                           ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-18 16:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: DRA: Add crossbar device binding Sricharan R
2013-07-18 19:04   ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-18 16:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: DRA7xx: Enable crossbar driver for the soc Sricharan R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5215F6F6.9060703@ti.com \
    --to=r.sricharan@ti$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox