Subject: [PATCH 0/2] net/cadence/macb: add support for dt phy definition

From: [email-masked] (boris brezillon)
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:13:59 +0200

On 27/08/2013 11:07, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hello Boris,
>
> 2013/8/27 boris brezillon <[email-masked]>:
>> Hello Dave,
>>
>>
>> On 26/08/2013 22:04, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Boris BREZILLON <[email-masked]>
>>> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:56:20 +0200
>>>
>>>> This patch series adds support for ethernet phy definition using device
>>>> tree.
>>>>
>>>> This may help in moving some at91 boards to dt (some of them define an
>>>> interrupt pin).
>>>>
>>>> Tested on samad31ek.
>>> Series applied to net-next, thanks.
>> Could you apply, the 3rd version of this series instead ?
>>
>> It fixes one bug when no phy is discovered and use the appropriate address
>> for the phy dt node.
>>
>> Sorry for the inconvenience.
> You will probably have to resubmit an incremental patch, I have never
> seen David pick up another version of a patch once it has been pushed
> out:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=8c038e7e14b1c5f156745e3c4df0a3aa46173dd9
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=148cbb53ace32f584d208764c7f7e6aa8edb970c
Okay, I will submit patches (based on net-next branch) to fix those bugs.

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Boris