public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: swarren@wwwdotorg•org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] clk: dt: binding for basic multiplexer clock
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:36:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52277DBF.7080104@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130903232219.10934.67434@quantum>

On 09/03/2013 05:22 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Stephen Warren (2013-08-30 14:37:46)
>> On 08/30/2013 02:33 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
...
>>> The clock _data_ seems to always have some churn to it. Moving it out to
>>> DT reduces that churn from Linux. My concern above is not about kernel
>>> data size.
>>
>> That sounds like the opposite of what we should be doing.
>>
>> It's fine for kernel code/data to change; that's a natural part of
>> development. Obviously, we should minimize churn, through thorough
>> review, domain knowledge, etc.
> 
> And with the "clock mapping" style bindings we'll end up changing both
> the DT binding definition and the kernel. Not great.

What's a "clock mapping" style binding? I guess that means the style
where you have a single DT node that provides multiple clocks, rather
than one DT node per clock?

If the kernel driver changes its internal data, I don't see why that
would have any impact at all on the DT binding definition. We should be
able to use one DT binding definition with arbitrary drivers.

> And I'll respond to your points below but the whole "relocate the
> problem to DT" argument is simply not my main point. What I want to do
> is increase the usefulness of DT by allowing register-level details into
> the binding which can 

Can you expand upon why a DT that encodes register-level details is more
useful? I can't see why there would be any difference in usefulness.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-04 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-22  5:53 [PATCH v4 0/5] clk: dt: bindings for mux, divider & gate clocks Mike Turquette
2013-08-22  5:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] clk: divider: replace bitfield width with mask Mike Turquette
2013-08-22  5:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] clk: of: helper for determining number of parent clocks Mike Turquette
2013-08-22  5:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] clk: dt: binding for basic multiplexer clock Mike Turquette
2013-08-28 15:50   ` Kumar Gala
2013-08-29  1:14     ` Mike Turquette
2013-08-29  6:58       ` Tero Kristo
2013-08-30  5:54         ` Tony Lindgren
2013-08-30 20:02       ` Kumar Gala
2013-08-30 20:33         ` Mike Turquette
2013-08-30 20:48           ` Kumar Gala
2013-08-30 21:37           ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-03 23:22             ` Mike Turquette
2013-09-04 18:36               ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-09-05 18:29                 ` Mike Turquette
2013-09-05 20:30                   ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-05 20:51                     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-09-06  6:53                     ` Tero Kristo
2013-09-06 19:01                       ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-07  4:15                         ` Saravana Kannan
2013-09-07 12:27                         ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-22  5:53 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] clk: dt: binding for basic divider clock Mike Turquette
2013-08-22  5:53 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] clk: dt: binding for basic gate clock Mike Turquette
2013-08-30  1:45   ` Haojian Zhuang
2013-08-30 20:06     ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-04  3:03       ` Haojian Zhuang
2013-09-04 17:59         ` Tony Lindgren
2013-09-07 11:56           ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-29 18:23 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] clk: dt: bindings for mux, divider & gate clocks Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-30  7:05   ` Tero Kristo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52277DBF.7080104@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox